Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22246414›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2012

Are routine pelvic radiographs in major pediatric blunt trauma necessary?

Jyothi Lagisetty, Thomas Slovis, Ronald Thomas, Stephen Knazik, Curt Stankovic

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04937868 (Developing a Decision Instrument to Guide Abdominal-pelvic CT Imaging of Blunt Trauma Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04937868 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Developing a Decision Instrument to Guide Abdominal-pelvic CT Imaging of Blunt Trauma Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2018 to 2027Enrolled12,000ConditionsAbdominal Injury, Pelvic Fracture, Genital Hemorrhage, Lumbar Spine InjuryArmsThere are no interventions associated with this study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jyothi LagisettyEmergency Medicine Department, Memorial Hermann Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Thomas Slovis
Ronald Thomas
Stephen Knazik
Curt Stankovic
Wayne State University · USChildren's Hospital of Michigan · USMemorial Hermann–Texas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening pelvic radiographs to rule out pelvic fractures are routinely used for the initial evaluation of pediatric blunt trauma. Recently, the utility of routine pelvic radiographs in certain subsets of patients with blunt trauma has been questioned. There is a growing amount of evidence that shows the clinical exam is reliable enough to obviate the need for routine screening pelvic radiographs in children.

objectiveTo identify variables that help predict the presence or absence of pelvic fractures in pediatric blunt trauma. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study from January 2005 to January 2010 using the trauma registry at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. We analyzed all level 1 and level 2 trauma victims, evaluating history, exam and mechanism of injury for association with the presence or absence of a pelvic fracture.

resultsOf 553 level 1 and 2 trauma patients who presented during the study period, 504 were included in the study. Most of these children, 486/504 (96.4%), showed no evidence of a pelvic fracture while 18/504 (3.6%) had a pelvic fracture. No factors were found to be predictive of a pelvic fracture. However, we developed a pelvic fracture screening tool that accurately rules out the presence of a pelvic fracture P = 0.008, NPV 99, sensitivity 96, 8.98 (1.52-52.8). This screening tool combines eight high-risk clinical findings (pelvic tenderness, laceration, ecchymosis, abrasion, GCS <14, positive urinalysis, abdominal pain/tenderness, femur fracture) and five high-risk mechanisms of injury (unrestrained motor vehicle collision [MVC], MVC with ejection, MVC rollover, auto vs. pedestrian, auto vs. bicycle).

conclusionPelvic fractures in pediatric major blunt trauma can reliably be ruled out by using our pelvic trauma screening tool. Although no findings accurately identified the presence of a pelvic fracture, the screening tool accurately identified the absence of a fracture, suggesting that pelvic radiographs are not warranted in this subset of patients.

Indexed as

Utilization ReviewAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFractures, BoneHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMichiganPelvic BonesPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22246414
OpenAlexW2019264351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.