Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22246197›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2012

Negative electroretinograms in the pediatric and adult population.

Johnstone M Kim, John F Payne, Jiong Yan, Claire S Barnes

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic On-Off ERG.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Electronegative Electroretinograms in the United Arab Emirates.Middle East African journal of ophthalmology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johnstone M KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
John F Payne
Jiong Yan
Claire S Barnes
Emory University · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To assess the frequency of negative waveform electroretinograms (ERGs) in a tertiary referral center. Design Retrospective chart review. Participants All patients who had an ERG performed at the electrophysiology clinic at Emory University from January 1999 through March 2008 were included in the study. Methods Patients with b-wave amplitude ≤ a-wave amplitude during the dark-adapted bright flash recording, in at least one eye, were identified as having a "negative ERG". Clinical information, such as age, gender, symptoms, best corrected visual acuity, and diagnoses were recorded for these patients when available. Results A total of 1,837 patients underwent ERG testing during the study period. Of those, 73 patients had a negative ERG, for a frequency of 4.0%. Within the adult (≥ 18 years of age) and pediatric populations, the frequencies of a negative ERG were 2.5 and 7.2%, respectively. Among the 73 cases, negative ERGs were more common among male than female patients, 6.7% versus 1.8% (P < 0.0001). Negative ERGs were most common among male children and least common among female adults, 9.6% versus 1.1%, respectively, (P < 0.0001). Overall in this group of patients, the most common diagnoses associated with a negative ERG were congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB, n = 29) and X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS, n = 7). Conclusions The overall frequency of negative ERGs in this large retrospective review was 4.0%. Negative ERGs were most common among male children and least common among female adults. Despite the growing number of new diagnoses associated with negative ERGs, CSNB, and XLRS appear to be the most likely diagnoses for a pediatric patient who presents with a negative ERG.

Indexed as

Dark AdaptationAdultChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialElectroretinographyEye Diseases, HereditaryFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic Diseases, X-LinkedHumansMaleMyopiaNight BlindnessRetinaRetinoschisis

Identifiers

PMID22246197
OpenAlexW2043962066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.