Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22244696›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2012

Non-invasive imaging of transplanted human neural stem cells and ECM scaffold remodeling in the stroke-damaged rat brain by (19)F- and diffusion-MRI.

Ellen Bible, Flavio Dell'Acqua, Bhavana Solanky, Anthony Balducci, Peter M Crapo, Stephen F Badylak, Eric T Ahrens, Michel Modo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Enabling Survival of Transplanted Neural Precursor Cells in the Ischemic Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellen BibleKings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, London SE5 9NU, UK.
Flavio Dell'Acqua
Bhavana Solanky
Anthony Balducci
Peter M Crapo
Stephen F Badylak
Eric T Ahrens
Michel Modo
King's College London · GBCelsense (United States) · USMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine · US

Funding

A MULTIDISCIPLINARY NMR CENTER FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHP41EB001977 · NIBIB · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI HO, CHIEN · 2003 to 2013
$12.5M
Neuro-Vascular RegenerationP20EB007076 · NIBIB · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HIRSCHI, KAREN KEMPER · 2006 to 2009
$4.4M
Human Endothelial Cell DifferentiationR01HL096360 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HIRSCHI, KAREN KEMPER · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council G0802552NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096360NIBIB NIH HHS 1 P20 EB007076-01NIBIB NIH HHS P20 EB007076NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB001977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transplantation of human neural stem cells (hNSCs) is emerging as a viable treatment for stroke related brain injury. However, intraparenchymal grafts do not regenerate lost tissue, but rather integrate into the host parenchyma without significantly affecting the lesion cavity. Providing a structural support for the delivered cells appears important for cell based therapeutic approaches. The non-invasive monitoring of therapeutic methods would provide valuable information regarding therapeutic strategies but remains a challenge. Labeling transplanted cells with metal-based (1)H-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents affects the visualization of the lesion cavity. Herein, we demonstrate that a (19)F-MRI contrast agent can adequately monitor the distribution of transplanted cells, whilst allowing an evaluation of the lesion cavity and the formation of new tissue on (1)H-MRI scans. Twenty percent of cells labeled with the (19)F agent were of host origin, potentially reflecting the re-uptake of label from dead transplanted cells. Both T(2)- and diffusion-weighted MRI scans indicated that transplantation of hNSCs suspended in a gel form of a xenogeneic extracellular matrix (ECM) bioscaffold resulted in uniformly distributed cells throughout the lesion cavity. However, diffusion MRI indicated that the injected materials did not yet establish diffusion barriers (i.e. cellular network, fiber tracts) normally found within striatal tissue. The ECM bioscaffold therefore provides an important support to hNSCs for the creation of de novo tissue and multi-nuclei MRI represents an adept method for the visualization of some aspects of this process. However, significant developments of both the transplantation paradigm, as well as regenerative imaging, are required to successfully create new tissue in the lesion cavity and to monitor this process non-invasively.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsBrainCell LineageCell SurvivalDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingExtracellular MatrixFluorineHumansNeural Stem CellsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReproducibility of ResultsStaining and LabelingStrokeTissue ScaffoldsFluorine

Identifiers

PMID22244696
PMCPMC3268910
OpenAlexW2061703101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.