Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22244323›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2012

Health literacy and cancer prevention: two new instruments to assess comprehension.

Kathleen M Mazor, Douglas W Roblin, Andrew E Williams, Sarah M Greene, Bridget Gaglio, Terry S Field, Mary E Costanza, Paul K J Han, Laura Saccoccio, Josephine Calvi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Literature Review of Cancer Communication with Indigenous Populations in Canada and the United States.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Health literacy and pap testing in insured women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2014
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Development of a Measurement Tool to Assess Students' Knowledge and Perceptions About Cancer (SKPaC).Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  15. Cervical Cancer Literacy in Women of Reproductive Age and Its Related Factors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Health literacy-listening skill and patient questions following cancer prevention and screening discussions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Article
  19. Comparison of Cancer-specific and General Health Literacy Assessments in an Educated Population: Correlations and Modifying Factors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kathleen M MazorMeyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group, Fallon Community Health Plan, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. Kathy.Mazor@meyersprimary.org
Douglas W Roblin
Andrew E Williams
Sarah M Greene
Bridget Gaglio
Terry S Field
Mary E Costanza
Paul K J Han
Laura Saccoccio
Josephine Calvi
Erica Cove
Rebecca Cowan

Funding

The HMO Cancer Research Network (CRN)U19CA079689 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI WAGNER, EDWARD H · 1999 to 2011
$62.6M
NCI NIH HHS U19 CA079689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAbility to understand spoken health information is an important facet of health literacy, but to date, no instrument has been available to quantify patients' ability in this area. We sought to develop a test to assess comprehension of spoken health messages related to cancer prevention and screening to fill this gap, and a complementary test of comprehension of written health messages.

methodsWe used the Sentence Verification Technique to write items based on realistic health messages about cancer prevention and screening, including media messages, clinical encounters and clinical print materials. Items were reviewed, revised, and pre-tested. Adults aged 40-70 participated in a pilot administration in Georgia, Hawaii, and Massachusetts.

resultsThe Cancer Message Literacy Test-Listening is self-administered via touchscreen laptop computer. No reading is required. It takes approximately 1 hour. The Cancer Message Literacy Test-Reading is self-administered on paper. It takes approximately 10min.

conclusionsThese two new tests will allow researchers to assess comprehension of spoken health messages, to examine the relationship between listening and reading literacy, and to explore the impact of each form of literacy on health-related outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Researchers and clinicians now have a means of measuring comprehension of spoken health information.

Indexed as

ComprehensionHealth LiteracyReadingAdultAgedEducational MeasurementEducational StatusFemaleGeorgiaHawaiiHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID22244323
PMCPMC3350821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.