Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22244070›Full record

ReviewJournal of shoulder and elbow surgery2012

Biomimetic scaffold design for functional and integrative tendon repair.

Xinzhi Zhang, Danielle Bogdanowicz, Cevat Erisken, Nancy M Lee, Helen H Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Rotator cuff repair and biologic augmentation-what do we know?JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Tendon mechanobiology in the context of tendon biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinzhi ZhangBiomaterials and Interface Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Danielle Bogdanowicz
Cevat Erisken
Nancy M Lee
Helen H Lu

Funding

Interface Tissue Engineering for Soft Tissue-to-Bone IntegrationR01AR055280 · NIAMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI LU, HELEN H · 2008 to 2014
$1.9M
Biphasic Nanofiber-based Scaffold for Tendon-to-Bone IntegrationR21AR056459 · NIAMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI LU, HELEN H · 2008 to 2009
$381k
Scaffold for Soft Tissue to Bone IntegrationR21AR052402 · NIAMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI LU, HELEN H · 2005 to 2006
$363k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR052402NIAMS NIH HHS AR055280NIAMS NIH HHS AR056459NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055280NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR052402NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR056459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears represent the most common shoulder injuries in the United States. The debilitating effect of this degenerative condition coupled with the high incidence of failure associated with existing graft choices underscores the clinical need for alternative grafting solutions. The 2 critical design criteria for the ideal tendon graft would require the graft to not only exhibit physiologically relevant mechanical properties but also be able to facilitate functional graft integration by promoting the regeneration of the native tendon-to-bone interface. Centered on these design goals, this review will highlight current approaches to functional and integrative tendon repair. In particular, the application of biomimetic design principles through the use of nanofiber- and nanocomposite-based scaffolds for tendon tissue engineering will be discussed. This review will begin with nanofiber-based approaches to functional tendon repair, followed by a section highlighting the exciting research on tendon-to-bone interface regeneration, with an emphasis on implementation of strategic biomimicry in nanofiber scaffold design and the concomitant formation of graded multi-tissue systems for integrative soft-tissue repair. This review will conclude with a summary and discussion of future directions.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBiomimeticsHumansNanofibersOrthopedic ProceduresProsthesis DesignRegenerationRotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesTendon InjuriesTensile StrengthWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID22244070
PMCPMC3260004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.