ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2012
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of children positive for antiphospholipid antibodies.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prolongated Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) in Pediatric Patients before Surgery-Crying Wolf: Lupus (Anticoagulant) Does Not Always Threaten Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Anti-Phospholipid Antibodies and COVID-19 Thrombosis: A Co-Star, Not a Supporting Actor.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Anti-phospholipid Antibodies and Smoking: An Overview.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2017Review
- Prevalence and Resolution of Lupus Anticoagulant in Children.Ochsner journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is difficult to estimate the actual prevalence of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in the paediatric population since there are no standardised criteria. We aimed to assess clinical and laboratory characteristics of a cohort of children positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) to contribute to the understanding of the heterogeneous aPL-related features in childhood. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-four patients with prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time were enrolled and assigned to group I ("transiently positive") or group II ("persistently positive"), based on the detection of elevated aPL plasma levels [lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) antibodies] on, respectively, one or more occasions, at least 12 weeks apart, by standard procedures. The clinical history and symptoms of all patients were recorded.
resultsThirty-three (75%) patients were assigned to group I, while the other 11 (25%) formed group II. Major associated diseases in group I were urticarial vasculitis (21%), acute infections (18%) and thalassaemia (12%). Five subjects (15%) were asymptomatic. Four out of the 11 subjects (36%) in group II had thrombotic events; they were all persistently aPL-positive and two of them had concomitant systemic lupus erythematosus. The rate of detection of LA-positivity was not significantly different between the two groups (76% vs 91%, p>0.05), whereas the percentage of patients positive for overall aCL was higher in group II than in group I (54% vs 42%, respectively; p<0.05). Specifically, aCL IgG and anti-β2GPI IgM subtypes were significantly more represented in group II than in group I (100% vs 62% and 75% vs 33%, respectively; p<0.05). DISCUSSION: Our study shows that aPL-positive children have different features that should be taken into account in the classification of criteria for paediatric APS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.