Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22243759›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2012

A new criterion for acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats.

Natalie A Peartree, Federico Sanabria, Kenneth J Thiel, Suzanne M Weber, Timothy H C Cheung, Janet L Neisewander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Behavioral mechanisms underlying nicotine reinforcement.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prior exposure to THC increases the addictive effects of nicotine in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2013
    Article
  14. Impact of tobacco regulation on animal research: new perspectives and opportunities.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie A PeartreeDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, PO Box 871104, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, United States.
Federico Sanabria
Kenneth J Thiel
Suzanne M Weber
Timothy H C Cheung
Janet L Neisewander
Arizona State University · US

Funding

NEURAL MECHANISMS OF DRUG SEEKING BEHAVIORR01DA011064 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI NEISEWANDER, JANET L · 1997 to 2018
$4.8M
Drugs as conditioned reinforcers and/or enhancers of social reward in adolescentsR21DA023123 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI NEISEWANDER, JANET L · 2007 to 2008
$404k
Nicotine and Social Reward Interactions in Adolescent RatsF31DA023746 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI THIEL, KENNETH JAMES · 2007 to 2009
$109k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA023746NIDA NIH HHS F31DA02746NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011064NIDA NIH HHS R01DA11064NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA023123NIDA NIH HHS R21DA023123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcquisition of nicotine self-administration in rodents is relatively difficult to establish and measures of acquisition rate are sometimes confounded by manipulations used to facilitate the process. This study examined acquisition of nicotine self-administration without such manipulations and used mathematical modeling to define the criterion for acquisition.

methodsRats were given 20 daily 2-h sessions occurring 6 days/week in chambers equipped with active and inactive levers. Each active lever press resulted in nicotine reinforcement (0-0.06 mg/kg, IV) and retraction of both levers for a 20-s time out, whereas inactive lever presses had no consequences. Acquisition was defined for individual rats by the higher likelihood of reinforcers obtained across sessions fitting a logistic over a constant function according to the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc).

resultsFor rats that acquired self-administration, an AICc-based multi-model comparison demonstrated that the asymptote (highest number of reinforcers/session) and mid-point of the acquisition curve (h; the number of sessions necessary to reach half the asymptote) varied by nicotine dose, with both exhibiting a negative relationship (the higher the dose, the lower number of reinforcers and the lower h).

conclusionsThe modeling approach used in this study provides a way of defining acquisition of nicotine self-administration that takes advantage of all data from individual subjects and the procedure used is sensitive to dose differences in the absence of manipulations that influence acquisition (e.g., food restriction, prior food reinforcement, conditioned reinforcers).

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsConditioning, OperantDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugLogistic ModelsMaleNicotineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement ScheduleSelf AdministrationNicotine

Identifiers

PMID22243759
PMCPMC3975132
OpenAlexW2046158843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.