ArticlePloS one2012
Lower-order effects adjustment in quantitative traits model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Missing Causality and Heritability of Autoimmune Hepatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Interpretable network-guided epistasis detection.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Novel EDGE encoding method enhances ability to identify genetic interactions.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Empowering individual trait prediction using interactions for precision medicine.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Candidate Genes for Age at Menarche Are Associated With Uterine Leiomyoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Confounding of linkage disequilibrium patterns in large scale DNA based gene-gene interaction studies.BioData mining · 2019Article
- The search for gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies: challenges in abundance of methods, practical considerations, and biological interpretation.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Identification of interactions using model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction.BMC proceedings · 2016Article
- A cautionary note on the impact of protocol changes for genome-wide association SNP × SNP interaction studies: an example on ankylosing spondylitis.Human genetics · 2015Article
- gammaMAXT: a fast multiple-testing correction algorithm.BioData mining · 2015Article
- Genome-wide association interaction analysis for Alzheimer's disease.Neurobiology of aging · 2014Article
- Practical aspects of genome-wide association interaction analysis.Human genetics · 2014Review
- A robustness study of parametric and non-parametric tests in model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction for epistasis detection.BioData mining · 2013Article
- An efficient algorithm to perform multiple testing in epistasis screening.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Interactions between genetic variants in AMH and AMHR2 may modify age at natural menopause.PloS one · 2013Article
- Association of ALOX5, LTA4H and LTC4S gene polymorphisms with ischemic stroke risk in a cohort of Chinese in east China.World journal of emergency medicine · 2013Article
- A family-based association test to detect gene-gene interactions in the presence of linkage.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying gene-gene interactions or gene-environment interactions in studies of human complex diseases remains a big challenge in genetic epidemiology. An additional challenge, often forgotten, is to account for important lower-order genetic effects. These may hamper the identification of genuine epistasis. If lower-order genetic effects contribute to the genetic variance of a trait, identified statistical interactions may simply be due to a signal boost of these effects. In this study, we restrict attention to quantitative traits and bi-allelic SNPs as genetic markers. Moreover, our interaction study focuses on 2-way SNP-SNP interactions. Via simulations, we assess the performance of different corrective measures for lower-order genetic effects in Model-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction epistasis detection, using additive and co-dominant coding schemes. Performance is evaluated in terms of power and familywise error rate. Our simulations indicate that empirical power estimates are reduced with correction of lower-order effects, likewise familywise error rates. Easy-to-use automatic SNP selection procedures, SNP selection based on "top" findings, or SNP selection based on p-value criterion for interesting main effects result in reduced power but also almost zero false positive rates. Always accounting for main effects in the SNP-SNP pair under investigation during Model-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction analysis adequately controls false positive epistasis findings. This is particularly true when adopting a co-dominant corrective coding scheme. In conclusion, automatic search procedures to identify lower-order effects to correct for during epistasis screening should be avoided. The same is true for procedures that adjust for lower-order effects prior to Model-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction and involve using residuals as the new trait. We advocate using "on-the-fly" lower-order effects adjusting when screening for SNP-SNP interactions using Model-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.