Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22242016›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Contribution of intragenic DNA methylation in mouse gametic DNA methylomes to establish oocyte-specific heritable marks.

Hisato Kobayashi, Takayuki Sakurai, Misaki Imai, Nozomi Takahashi, Atsushi Fukuda, Obata Yayoi, Shun Sato, Kazuhiko Nakabayashi, Kenichiro Hata, Yusuke Sotomaru and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 290 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
290citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

290 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 559 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. On the state of chromatin in mammalian sperm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Gonocytes in Transition: Establishing the Male Germline Identity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

230 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hisato KobayashiDepartment of BioScience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki Sakurai
Misaki Imai
Nozomi Takahashi
Atsushi Fukuda
Obata Yayoi
Shun Sato
Kazuhiko Nakabayashi
Kenichiro Hata
Yusuke Sotomaru
Yutaka Suzuki
Tomohiro Kono
Tokyo University of Agriculture · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPHiroshima University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide dynamic changes in DNA methylation are indispensable for germline development and genomic imprinting in mammals. Here, we report single-base resolution DNA methylome and transcriptome maps of mouse germ cells, generated using whole-genome shotgun bisulfite sequencing and cDNA sequencing (mRNA-seq). Oocyte genomes showed a significant positive correlation between mRNA transcript levels and methylation of the transcribed region. Sperm genomes had nearly complete coverage of methylation, except in the CpG-rich regions, and showed a significant negative correlation between gene expression and promoter methylation. Thus, these methylome maps revealed that oocytes and sperms are widely different in the extent and distribution of DNA methylation. Furthermore, a comparison of oocyte and sperm methylomes identified more than 1,600 CpG islands differentially methylated in oocytes and sperm (germline differentially methylated regions, gDMRs), in addition to the known imprinting control regions (ICRs). About half of these differentially methylated DNA sequences appear to be at least partially resistant to the global DNA demethylation that occurs during preimplantation development. In the absence of Dnmt3L, neither methylation of most oocyte-methylated gDMRs nor intragenic methylation was observed. There was also genome-wide hypomethylation, and partial methylation at particular retrotransposons, while maintaining global gene expression, in oocytes. Along with the identification of the many Dnmt3L-dependent gDMRs at intragenic regions, the present results suggest that oocyte methylation can be divided into 2 types: Dnmt3L-dependent methylation, which is required for maternal methylation imprinting, and Dnmt3L-independent methylation, which might be essential for endogenous retroviral DNA silencing. The present data provide entirely new perspectives on the evaluation of epigenetic markers in germline cells.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGenomic ImprintingAnimalsBlastocystCpG IslandsDNA, ComplementaryDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyGerm CellsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMiceDNA, ComplementaryDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDnmt3l protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22242016
PMCPMC3252278
OpenAlexW2034219651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.