ArticleThe oncologist2012
Immunogenicity of an inactivated monovalent 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in patients who have cancer.
Article in The oncologist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune response of COVID-19 vaccines in solid cancer patients: A meta-analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- A Malaysian consensus recommendation for the prevention of influenza in older persons.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Clinical Determinants Differentiating the Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients: Hospital Care or Home Recovery.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Influenza vaccination in breast cancer patients during subcutaneous trastuzumab in adjuvant setting.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
- Immunogenicity of high-dose influenza vaccination in patients with primary central nervous system malignancy.Neuro-oncology practice · 2018Article
- Vaccination in oncology practice and predictors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Article
- Immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccine in patients with lung cancer undergoing anticancer chemotherapy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Article
- Influenza vaccine immunogenicity in patients with primary central nervous system malignancy.Neuro-oncology · 2014Article
- Influenza vaccination in oncology patients.Current infectious disease reports · 2013Article
- The peripheral myeloid expansion driven by murine cancer progression is reversed by radiation therapy of the tumor.PloS one · 2013Article
- Vaccination of oncology patients: an effective tool and an opportunity not to be missed.The oncologist · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe immune response of patients who have cancer, who may be receiving immunosuppressive therapy, is generally considered to be decreased. This study aimed to evaluate the immune response of cancer patients to the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a prospective single site study comparing the immune response after H1N1 vaccination of healthy controls (group A), patients who had solid tumors and were taking myelosuppressive chemotherapy (group B), patients who had solid tumors and were taking nonmyelosuppressive or no treatment (group C), and patients who had hematologic malignancies (group D).
resultsAt 2-6 weeks after vaccination, seroconversion was observed in 80.0% of group A (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.0%-89.7%), 72.2% of group B (95% CI, 55.9%-84.3%), 87.0% of group C (95% CI, 72.2%-94.7%), and 75.0% of group D (95% CI, 52.8%-89.2%) (p = NS). The geometric mean titer ratio, that is, geometric mean factor increase in antibody titer after vaccination, was 12.6 (95% CI, 7.9-19.9), 12.7 (95% CI, 7.3-22.1), 23.0 (95% CI, 13.9-38.2), and 12.1 (95% CI, 5.3-27.9) (p = NS), and the seroprotection rates were 95.5% (95% CI, 84.0%-99.6%), 79.0% (95% CI, 63.4%-89.2%), 90.5% (95% CI, 77.4%-96.8%), and 90.0% (95% CI, 71%-98.7%) in the corresponding groups (p = NS). Immune responses were robust regardless of malignancy, or time intervals between the use of myelosuppressive or immunosuppressive medications and vaccination. No participants developed clinical H1N1 infection.
conclusionCancer patients, whether taking myelosuppressive chemotherapy or not, are able to generate an immune response to the H1N1 vaccine similar to that of healthy controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.