Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22240540›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2012

Immunogenicity of an inactivated monovalent 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in patients who have cancer.

Yiqing Xu, Nanda Methuku, Praveena Coimbatore, Theresa Fitzgerald, Yiwu Huang, Ying-Yi Xiao, Murali Pagala, Shachi Gupta, William Solomon, Philip Rubin and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vaccination in oncology practice and predictors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Influenza vaccination in oncology patients.Current infectious disease reports · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yiqing XuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, 6300 8 Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11220, USA. yxu@maimonidesmed.org
Nanda Methuku
Praveena Coimbatore
Theresa Fitzgerald
Yiwu Huang
Ying-Yi Xiao
Murali Pagala
Shachi Gupta
William Solomon
Philip Rubin
John Treanor
Alan Astrow
Howard Minkoff
Jay S Cooper
Maimonides Medical Center · USUniversity of Rochester · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) IIIU01AI031834 · NIAID · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUSTAFSON, DEBORAH R., MINKOFF, HOWARD · 1998 to 2018
$53.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe immune response of patients who have cancer, who may be receiving immunosuppressive therapy, is generally considered to be decreased. This study aimed to evaluate the immune response of cancer patients to the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a prospective single site study comparing the immune response after H1N1 vaccination of healthy controls (group A), patients who had solid tumors and were taking myelosuppressive chemotherapy (group B), patients who had solid tumors and were taking nonmyelosuppressive or no treatment (group C), and patients who had hematologic malignancies (group D).

resultsAt 2-6 weeks after vaccination, seroconversion was observed in 80.0% of group A (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.0%-89.7%), 72.2% of group B (95% CI, 55.9%-84.3%), 87.0% of group C (95% CI, 72.2%-94.7%), and 75.0% of group D (95% CI, 52.8%-89.2%) (p = NS). The geometric mean titer ratio, that is, geometric mean factor increase in antibody titer after vaccination, was 12.6 (95% CI, 7.9-19.9), 12.7 (95% CI, 7.3-22.1), 23.0 (95% CI, 13.9-38.2), and 12.1 (95% CI, 5.3-27.9) (p = NS), and the seroprotection rates were 95.5% (95% CI, 84.0%-99.6%), 79.0% (95% CI, 63.4%-89.2%), 90.5% (95% CI, 77.4%-96.8%), and 90.0% (95% CI, 71%-98.7%) in the corresponding groups (p = NS). Immune responses were robust regardless of malignancy, or time intervals between the use of myelosuppressive or immunosuppressive medications and vaccination. No participants developed clinical H1N1 infection.

conclusionCancer patients, whether taking myelosuppressive chemotherapy or not, are able to generate an immune response to the H1N1 vaccine similar to that of healthy controls.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID22240540
PMCPMC3267811
OpenAlexW2138042091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.