Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22239757›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2012

Lim homeobox genes in the Ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi: the evolution of neural cell type specification.

David K Simmons, Kevin Pang, Mark Q Martindale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evo-devo applied to sleep research: an approach whose time has come.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Nitric oxide signaling in ctenophores.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Independent origins of neurons and synapses: insights from ctenophores.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Where is my mind? How sponges and placozoans may have lost neural cell types.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  16. Retinoic acid signaling and neuronal differentiation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Convergent evolution of neural systems in ctenophores.The Journal of experimental biology · 2015
    Review
  19. Islet is a key determinant of ascidian palp morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David K SimmonsKewalo Marine Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA, 96813. mqmartin@hawaii.edu.
Kevin Pang
Mark Q Martindale
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNervous systems are thought to be important to the evolutionary success and diversification of metazoans, yet little is known about the origin of simple nervous systems at the base of the animal tree. Recent data suggest that ctenophores, a group of macroscopic pelagic marine invertebrates, are the most ancient group of animals that possess a definitive nervous system consisting of a distributed nerve net and an apical statocyst. This study reports on details of the evolution of the neural cell type specifying transcription factor family of LIM homeobox containing genes (Lhx), which have highly conserved functions in neural specification in bilaterian animals.

resultsUsing next generation sequencing, the first draft of the genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi has been generated. The Lhx genes in all animals are represented by seven subfamilies (Lhx1/5, Lhx3/4, Lmx, Islet, Lhx2/9, Lhx6/8, and LMO) of which four were found to be represented in the ctenophore lineage (Lhx1/5, Lhx3/4, Lmx, and Islet). Interestingly, the ctenophore Lhx gene complement is more similar to the sponge complement (sponges do not possess neurons) than to either the cnidarian-bilaterian or placozoan Lhx complements. Using whole mount in situ hybridization, the Lhx gene expression patterns were examined and found to be expressed around the blastopore and in cells that give rise to the apical organ and putative neural sensory cells.

conclusionThis research gives us a first look at neural cell type specification in the ctenophore M. leidyi. Within M. leidyi, Lhx genes are expressed in overlapping domains within proposed neural cellular and sensory cell territories. These data suggest that Lhx genes likely played a conserved role in the patterning of sensory cells in the ancestor of sponges and ctenophores, and may provide a link to the expression of Lhx orthologs in sponge larval photoreceptive cells. Lhx genes were later co-opted into patterning more diversified complements of neural and non-neural cell types in later evolving animals.

Identifiers

PMID22239757
PMCPMC3283466
OpenAlexW2150821870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.