Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22239440›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2012

Targeting the MAPK-RAS-RAF signaling pathway in cancer therapy.

Libero Santarpia, Scott M Lippman, Adel K El-Naggar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 530 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
530citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

530 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,025 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. TargetingJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

470 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Libero SantarpiaThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Houston, TX,USA.
Scott M Lippman
Adel K El-Naggar
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USWeatherford College · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the p53 pathway for reversal of oral premalignancyP50CA097007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MYERS, JEFFREY NICHOLAS · 2002 to 2012
$26.1M
Molecular and Epidemiologic Characterization of Salivary Gland CarcinomasU01DE019765 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI EL-NAGGAR, ADEL K. · 2009 to 2013
$6.9M
NCI NIH HHS NCI-CA-16672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097007NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE019765NIDCR NIH HHS U01DE019765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe MAPK pathway comprises several key signaling components and phosphorylation events that play a role in tumorigenesis. These activated kinases transmit extracellular signals that regulate cell growth, differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis and migration functions. Alteration of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK-MAPK (RAS-MAPK) pathway has been reported in human cancer as a result of abnormal activation of receptor tyrosine kinases or gain-of-function mutations mainly in the RAS or RAF genes. These pathways are considered potential therapeutic targets for cancer treatment. Recently, several small-molecule inhibitors targeting this pathway have been developed and are currently being tested in clinical trials. AREAS COVERED: The biological role of the RAS-MAPK pathway, the consequence of its disregulation and the development of small-molecule inhibitors. The rationale for targeting the RAS-MAPK pathway and the application and the results of various inhibitory molecules as anticancer agents in clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: Inhibitors of MEK and particularly of RAF kinases have shown effectiveness in clinical trials with manageable side effects. RAS and BRAF genes need to be analyzed for mutations as markers of response to treatments and to avoid paradoxical effects. Further characterization of the RAS-MAPK molecular mechanisms regulation in malignant cells or underlying the acquired resistance to RAF inhibitors will facilitate development of novel combination therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNeoplasmsraf Kinasesras ProteinsSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinasesraf Kinasesras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22239440
PMCPMC3457779
OpenAlexW2058142370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.