Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22238470›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2012

Noninferiority of miltefosine versus meglumine antimoniate for cutaneous leishmaniasis in children.

Luisa Consuelo Rubiano, María Consuelo Miranda, Sandra Muvdi Arenas, Luz Mery Montero, Isabel Rodríguez-Barraquer, Daniel Garcerant, Martín Prager, Lyda Osorio, Maria Ximena Rojas, Mauricio Pérez and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00487253 (Randomized Clinical Trial of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Oral Miltefosine Versus Parenteral Antimony for the Treatment of Pediatric Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Colombia), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00487253 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Clinical Trial of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Oral Miltefosine Versus Parenteral Antimony for the Treatment of Pediatric Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Colombia

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones MédicasRan2007 to 2010Enrolled150ConditionsCutaneous LeishmaniasisArmsMiltefosine, Meglumine antimoniate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Luisa Consuelo RubianoCentro Internacional De Entrenamiento E Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.
María Consuelo Miranda
Sandra Muvdi Arenas
Luz Mery Montero
Isabel Rodríguez-Barraquer
Daniel Garcerant
Martín Prager
Lyda Osorio
Maria Ximena Rojas
Mauricio Pérez
Ruben Santiago Nicholls
Nancy Gore Saravia
Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Medicas · COCentro Dermatológico Federico Lleras Acosta · COInstituto Nacional de Salud · COSan Juan Bautista School of Medicine · PRUniversidad del Valle · CO

Funding

Miltefosine in Pediatric Cutaneous LeishmaniasisU19AI065866 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCMAHON PRATT, DIANE · 2005 to 2009
$5.0M
Vector/Host-Parasite Interface of Leishmaniasis in ColombiaD43TW006589 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GORE SARAVIA, NANCY, TSCHUDI, CHRISTIAN · 2003 to 2024
$4.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW006589NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI065866PHS HHS 1 U19AIO65866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren have a lower response rate to antimonial drugs and higher elimination rate of antimony (Sb) than adults. Oral miltefosine has not been evaluated for pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis.

methodsA randomized, noninferiority clinical trial with masked evaluation was conducted at 3 locations in Colombia where Leishmania panamensis and Leishmania guyanensis predominated. One hundred sixteen children aged 2-12 years with parasitologically confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis were randomized to directly observed treatment with meglumine antimoniate (20 mg Sb/kg/d for 20 days; intramuscular) (n = 58) or miltefosine (1.8-2.5 mg/kg/d for 28 days; by mouth) (n = 58). Primary outcome was treatment failure at or before week 26 after initiation of treatment. Miltefosine was noninferior if the proportion of treatment failures was ≤15% higher than achieved with meglumine antimoniate (1-sided test, α = .05).

resultsNinety-five percent of children (111/116) completed follow-up evaluation. By intention-to-treat analysis, failure rate was 17.2% (98% confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-28.7%) for miltefosine and 31% (98% CI, 16.9%-45.2%) for meglumine antimoniate. The difference between treatment groups was 13.8%, (98% CI, -4.5% to 32%) (P = .04). Adverse events were mild for both treatments.

conclusionsMiltefosine is noninferior to meglumine antimoniate for treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) species. Advantages of oral administration and low toxicity favor use of miltefosine in children. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT00487253.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAntiprotozoal AgentsChildChild, PreschoolColombiaFemaleHumansLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMaleMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniateOrganometallic CompoundsPhosphorylcholineTreatment FailureAntiprotozoal AgentsMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniatemiltefosineOrganometallic CompoundsPhosphorylcholine

Identifiers

PMID22238470
PMCPMC3266136
OpenAlexW2125774524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.