Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22238435›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Comparative study using phenotypic, genotypic, and proteomics methods for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Anne J M Loonen, Arjan R Jansz, Jeandery N B Bergland, Marion Valkenburg, Petra F G Wolffs, Adriaan J C van den Brule

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. WGS Analysis ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Efficacy of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as well as genotypic and phenotypic methods in identification of staphylococci other thanJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Molecular Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci Clinical Isolates from a Tertiary Hospital in Northern Thailand.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne J M LoonenPAMM Laboratories, Department of Medical Microbiology, Eindhoven-Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Arjan R Jansz
Jeandery N B Bergland
Marion Valkenburg
Petra F G Wolffs
Adriaan J C van den Brule

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five methods were compared to determine the most accurate method for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (n = 142 strains). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) showed the best results for rapid and accurate CoNS differentiation (99.3% of strains correctly identified). An alternative to this approach could be Vitek2 combined with partial tuf gene sequencing (100% of strains correctly identified when both methods are performed simultaneously).

Indexed as

Molecular TypingCoagulaseGenotypePhenotypeProteomicsReference StandardsRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationStaphylococcusCoagulaseRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID22238435
PMCPMC3318536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.