ArticleJournal of virology2012
The viral protein Tat can inhibit the establishment of HIV-1 latency.
Article in Journal of virology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breaking into HIV-1's Epigenetic Vault: Cure Strategies to Eliminate the Viral Reservoir.Viruses · 2026Review
- HIV-1 latency: From acquaintance to confidant.Journal of virus eradication · 2025Review
- Post-Docking Refinement of Peptide or Protein-RNA Complexes Using Thermal Titration Molecular Dynamics (TTMD): A Stability Insight.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Antiretroviral therapy initiated during acute infection in women with HIV-1 clade C reduces anti-Tat antibody production and lowers CD8+ T cell activation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- The role of Tat in HIV latency and reactivation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- HIV Tat as a latency reversing agent: turning the tables on viral persistence.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Variation in HIV-1 Tat activity is a key determinant in the establishment of latent infection.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Nanoparticle delivery of Tat synergizes with classical latency reversal agents to express HIV antigen targets.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- A Canadian Survey of Research on HIV-1 Latency-Where Are We Now and Where Are We Heading?Viruses · 2024Review
- Potent latency reversal by Tat RNA-containing nanoparticle enables multi-omic analysis of the HIV-1 reservoir.Nature communications · 2023Article
- HIV-1 Tat amino acid residues that influence Tat-TAR binding affinity: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- So Pathogenic or So What?-A Brief Overview of SIV Pathogenesis with an Emphasis on Cure Research.Viruses · 2022Review
- IRF7 expression correlates with HIV latency reversal upon specific blockade of immune activation.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- The reservoir of latent HIV.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- The RNA-Binding Proteins SRP14 and HMGB3 Control HIV-1 Tat mRNA Processing and Translation During HIV-1 Latency.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- NF-κB-Interacting Long Noncoding RNA Regulates HIV-1 Replication and Latency by Repressing NF-κB Signaling.Journal of virology · 2020Article
- Review
- Tat IRES modulator of tat mRNA (TIM-TAM): a conserved RNA structure that controls Tat expression and acts as a switch for HIV productive and latent infection.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- HIV-1 Tat: Role in Bystander Toxicity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The establishment of HIV-1 latency can result from limiting levels of transcription initiation or elongation factors, restrictive chromatin modifications, transcriptional interference, and insufficient Tat activity. Since the viral protein Tat can counteract many of these factors, we hypothesized that the presence of exogenous Tat during infection might inhibit the establishment of latency. This was explored using a Jurkat model of latency establishment and reactivation. PCR and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed the latent state in this model and showed evidence of transcriptional interference. To address our hypothesis, cells undergoing infection were first exposed to either purified recombinant Tat or a transactivation-negative mutant. Only the former resulted in a modest inhibition of the establishment of latency. Next, Jurkat cells stably expressing intracellular Tat were used in our latency model to avoid limitations of Tat delivery. Experiments confirmed that intracellular Tat expression did not affect the susceptibility of these cells to viral infection. Eight weeks after infection, Jurkat cells expressing Tat harbored up to 1,700-fold fewer (P < 0.01) latent viruses than Jurkat cells that did not express Tat. Additionally, Tat delivered by a second virus was sufficient to reactivate most of the latent population. Our results suggest that inhibition of the establishment of latent infection is theoretically possible. In a hypothetical scenario of therapy that induces viral gene expression during acute infection, activation of viruses which would otherwise have entered latency could occur while concurrent highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) would prevent further viral spread, potentially decreasing the size of the established latent reservoir.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.