Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22237661›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2012

Synaptic plasticity in the medial superior olive of hearing, deaf, and cochlear-implanted cats.

Natasha N Tirko, David K Ryugo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dissociated Representation of Binaural Cues in Single-Sided Deafness: Implications for Cochlear Implantation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Improved Neural Coding of ITD with Bilateral Cochlear Implants by Introducing Short Inter-pulse Intervals.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natasha N TirkoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Hearing and Balance, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
David K Ryugo
Garvan Institute of Medical Research · AUJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

SINGLE-CELL MARKING STUDIES OF THE AUDITORY NERVER01DC000232 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RYUGO, DAVID K. · 1989 to 2010
$6.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC000232NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial superior olive (MSO) is a key auditory brainstem structure that receives binaural inputs and is implicated in processing interaural time disparities used for sound localization. The deaf white cat, a proven model of congenital deafness, was used to examine how deafness and cochlear implantation affected the synaptic organization at this binaural center in the ascending auditory pathway. The patterns of axosomatic and axodendritic organization were determined for principal neurons from the MSO of hearing, deaf, and deaf cats with cochlear implants. The nature of the synapses was evaluated through electron microscopy, ultrastructure analysis of the synaptic vesicles, and immunohistochemistry. The results show that the proportion of inhibitory axosomatic terminals was significantly smaller in deaf animals when compared with hearing animals. However, after a period of electrical stimulation via cochlear implants the proportion of inhibitory inputs resembled that of hearing animals. Additionally, the excitatory axodendritic boutons of hearing cats were found to be significantly larger than those of deaf cats. Boutons of stimulated cats were significantly larger than the boutons in deaf cats, although not as large as in the hearing cats, indicating a partial recovery of excitatory inputs to MSO dendrites after stimulation. These results exemplify dynamic plasticity in the auditory brainstem and reveal that electrical stimulation through cochlear implants has a restorative effect on synaptic organization in the MSO.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysCatsCochlear ImplantationDeafnessDisease Models, AnimalElectric StimulationElectron Microscope TomographyGlycine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsNeuronal PlasticityOlivary NucleusSynapsesSynaptic VesiclesVesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1Glycine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsVesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID22237661
PMCPMC3963361
OpenAlexW2163083878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.