ArticleInfection2012
The clinical differences between dengue and scrub typhus with acute respiratory failure in southern Taiwan.
Article in Infection, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome in scrub typhus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infection · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor both dengue and scrub typhus, acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a serious complication. The present study was carried out in order to investigate the clinical courses and outcomes of adult dengue and scrub typhus patients with ARF, and to identify the clinical differences between adult dengue and scrub typhus patients with ARF.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of the serologically confirmed adult dengue or scrub typhus patients admitted between 1998 and 2008 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. A total of 980 dengue and 102 scrub typhus adult patients were included in our study.
resultsEighteen of the 980 adult dengue patients and 8 of the 102 adult scrub typhus patients had ARF. There were significant differences that existed for eschar (P = 0.001; dengue 0%; scrub 62.5%), cough (P = 0.016; dengue 55.6%; scrub typhus 100%), white blood cell (WBC) count [P = 0.026; dengue 7.40 ± 5.74; scrub typhus 11.84 ± 4.95 (×10(3)/μL)], platelet count [P = 0.008; dengue 42.2 ± 33.9; scrub typhus 104.1 ± 93.3 (×10(9)/L)], prothrombin time (PT) [P = 0.007; dengue 12.82 ± 1.36; scrub typhus 10.74 ± 0.98 (s)], activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) [P = 0.002; dengue 50.81 ± 10.08; scrub typhus 37.44 ± 4.06 (s)], blood urea nitrogen (BUN) [P < 0.001; dengue 64.6 ± 43.2; scrub typhus 20.9 ± 9.1 (mg/dL)], creatinine [P < 0.001; dengue 3.77 ± 3.37; scrub typhus 1.05 ± 0.37 (mg/dL)], admission day (A-day) [P = 0.027; dengue 2.9 ± 1.3; scrub typhus 5.4 ± 2.6 (days)], and ventilator duration [P = 0.022; dengue 9.4 ± 14.0; scrub typhus 14.8 ± 10.4 (days)] between both groups.
conclusionsThis study provides relatively rare data regarding the clinical differences between adult dengue and scrub typhus patients with ARF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.