Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22237424›Full record

ReviewJournal of innate immunity2012

Immune response in the barrier epithelia: lessons from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Monica M Davis, Ylva Engström

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of innate immunity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insects · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Immunological Roles ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monica M DavisDepartment of Molecular Biology and Functional Genomics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ylva Engström
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The barrier epithelia of multicellular organisms frequently come into direct contact with microorganisms and thus need to fulfill the important task of preventing the penetration of pathogens that could cause systemic infections. A functional immune defence in the epithelial linings of the digestive, respiratory and reproductive organs as well as the epidermis/skin of animals is therefore of crucial importance for survival. Epithelial defence reactions are likely to be evolutionarily ancient, and the use of invertebrate animal models, such as insects and nematodes, has been crucial in unravelling the mechanisms underlying epithelial immunity. This review addresses basic questions of epithelial immunity in animals and humans. It focuses on recent developments in the understanding of the immune responses in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and how the innate immune system acts locally in the epidermis and cuticle, tracheae, gut and genital organs. Both basal immune activities in epithelia that are constantly exposed to microbes as well as positive and negative regulation in response to pathogenic organisms are covered. Important immuno-physiological aspects of epithelial defence mechanisms are also discussed, such as wound healing, re-epithelialization and intestinal homeostasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesDrosophila melanogasterEpitheliumHomeodomain ProteinsHomeostasisHumansImmunity, InnateImmunomodulationIntestinal MucosaReceptors, Pattern RecognitionRespiratory SystemSignal TransductionSkinTranscriptional ActivationAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesHomeodomain ProteinsReceptors, Pattern Recognition

Identifiers

PMID22237424
PMCPMC6741545
OpenAlexW2072251157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.