Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22237392›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2012

Cancer stem cells: an evolving concept.

Long V Nguyen, Robert Vanner, Peter Dirks, Connie J Eaves

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 639 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
639citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

639 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oocyte-inspired universal whole-cell vaccines against tumor heterogeneity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Stilbenes from Vine Extracts: Therapeutic Potential and Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Protein Marker-Dependent Drug Discovery Targeting Breast Cancer Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

579 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Long V NguyenTerry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Robert Vanner
Peter Dirks
Connie J Eaves

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) concept derives from the fact that cancers are dysregulated tissue clones whose continued propagation is vested in a biologically distinct subset of cells that are typically rare. This idea is not new, but has recently gained prominence because of advances in defining normal tissue hierarchies, a greater appreciation of the multistep nature of oncogenesis and improved methods to propagate primary human cancers in immunodeficient mice. As a result we have obtained new insights into why the CSC concept is not universally applicable, as well as a new basis for understanding the complex evolution, phenotypic heterogeneity and therapeutic challenges of many human cancers.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenomic InstabilityHumansMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsStochastic ProcessesTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID22237392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.