Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22237262›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2012

Correlation between MET gene copy number by silver in situ hybridization and protein expression by immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer.

Rafal Dziadziuszko, Murry W Wynes, Shalini Singh, Bernadette Reyna Asuncion, James Ranger-Moore, Krzysztof Konopa, Witold Rzyman, Barbara Szostakiewicz, Jacek Jassem, Fred R Hirsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cancers · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafal DziadziuszkoMedical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Murry W Wynes
Shalini Singh
Bernadette Reyna Asuncion
James Ranger-Moore
Krzysztof Konopa
Witold Rzyman
Barbara Szostakiewicz
Jacek Jassem
Fred R Hirsch
Gdańsk Medical University · PLVentana Research Corporation (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Tissue Bank and Biomarkers CoreP50CA058187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MILLER, YORK E · 1992 to 2018
$43.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe MET receptor is involved in the pathogenesis and progression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials with MET inhibitors in NSCLC are planned with patient selection based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or gene copy number assessment. Therefore, a detailed understanding of relationship between these markers and prognosis is essential.

methodsThis study included tumors from 189 patients with NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection (median follow-up, 5.3 years). MET expression was evaluated by IHC on tissue microarrays and scored according to hybrid (H) score (range: 0-400) and by scoring system used in the MetMAb trial (≥ 50% of cells with moderate or strong staining). MET gene copy number was assessed by silver in situ hybridization (n =140 patients).

resultsMedian MET IHC H score was 60 (range: 0-400; n =174). There were no associations between clinical and pathological characteristics, disease-free survival, and overall survival according to median value (p =0.36 and p =0.38, respectively), or other cut-points. According to MetMAb scoring criteria, IHC positivity rate was 25%, again with no associations to clinicopathological features or survival. In 140 tumors evaluable for MET copy number, 3 (2.1%) showed gene amplification and 14 (10%) had tumors with average of 5 or more copies per nucleus. There were no associations of MET copy number with clinical characteristics, disease-free survival, or overall survival with any analyzed cut-points. Correlation between MET copy number and protein expression was significant (Pearson's r =0.42, p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThere is a significant correlation between MET protein expression and MET gene copy number in operable NSCLC, but neither is associated with prognosis.

Indexed as

Gene DosageAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell NucleusCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene AmplificationHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesIn Situ HybridizationMET protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-met

Identifiers

PMID22237262
PMCPMC3358920
OpenAlexW2055080028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.