Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22237261›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2012

A phase I/II study of erlotinib in combination with the anti-insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor monoclonal antibody IMC-A12 (cixutumumab) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Andrew Weickhardt, Robert Doebele, Ana Oton, Janice Lettieri, DeLee Maxson, Michele Reynolds, Amy Brown, Mary K Jackson, Grace Dy, Araba Adjei and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Linsitinib (OSI-906) and Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  12. Implications of Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor Activation in Lung Cancer.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew WeickhardtUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA. andrew.weickhardt@ucdenver.edu
Robert Doebele
Ana Oton
Janice Lettieri
DeLee Maxson
Michele Reynolds
Amy Brown
Mary K Jackson
Grace Dy
Araba Adjei
Gerald Fetterly
Xian Lu
Wilbur Franklin
Marileila Varella-Garcia
Fred R Hirsch
Murry W Wynes
Hagop Youssoufian
Alex Adjei
D Ross Camidge
University of Colorado Cancer Center · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USColorado School of Public Health · US

Funding

Tissue Bank and Biomarkers CoreP50CA058187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MILLER, YORK E · 1992 to 2018
$43.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058187PHS HHS NCI 8148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis phase I/II study evaluated the safety and antitumor effect of the combination of erlotinib with cixutumumab, a recombinant fully humanized anti-insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor IgG1 monoclonal antibody, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsPatients with advanced NSCLC were treated in an initial safety-lead and drop-down cohorts using erlotinib 150 mg/d with cixutumumab 6 or 5 mg/kg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in 28-day cycles (cohorts 1 and 2). Emerging pharmacokinetic data led to an additional cohort (3 + 3 design) with cixutumumab at 15 mg/kg on day 1 in 21-day cycles (cohort 3).

resultsEighteen patients entered the study (6 at 6 mg/kg, 8 at 5 mg/kg, and 4 at 15 mg/kg), with median age of 65 years. Four of six patients at 6 mg/kg experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), whereas at 5 mg/kg, one of eight patients experienced DLT but three of eight patients still required a dose delay during cycle 1. At 15 mg/kg every 21 days, two of four patients experienced DLTs. In all cohorts, DLTs were either G3 rash or fatigue. Five patients had stable disease as best response and 14 patients had progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 39 days (range 21-432+ days). Biomarkers analyses showed a trend toward better progression-free survival seen with higher free baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 levels as seen with other insulin-like growth factor-1R inhibitors.

conclusionsThe combinations of cixutumumab at 6 mg/kg every 7 days and 15 mg/kg every 21 days and full-dose erlotinib are not tolerable in unselected patients with NSCLC, as measured by DLT. Cixutumumab at 5 mg/kg every 7 days was tolerable per DLT, but dose delays were common. Efficacy in unselected patients with NSCLC seems to be low.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedcixutumumabErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesReceptor, IGF Type 1

Identifiers

PMID22237261
PMCPMC3358820
OpenAlexW2145899075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.