Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22237209›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2012

Removal of uracil by uracil DNA glycosylase limits pemetrexed cytotoxicity: overriding the limit with methoxyamine to inhibit base excision repair.

A D Bulgar, L D Weeks, Y Miao, S Yang, Y Xu, C Guo, S Markowitz, N Oleinick, S L Gerson, L Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A D BulgarDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
L D Weeks
Y Miao
S Yang
Y Xu
C Guo
S Markowitz
N Oleinick
S L Gerson
L Liu
Case Western Reserve University · USCornell University · US

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK R CHANCE · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024989 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PAMELA B · 2007 to 2011
$53.7M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
MODULATING BASE EXCISION REPAIR IN TUMOR DRUG RESISTANCER01CA086357 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSON, STANTON L. · 2000 to 2008
$2.4M
Altered MGMT in Acquired Drug ResistanceR01CA082292 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, LILI · 2001 to 2004
$826k
NCI NIH HHS CA43703NCI NIH HHS CA82292NCI NIH HHS CA86357NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA086357NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) specifically removes uracil bases from DNA, and its repair activity determines the sensitivity of the cell to anticancer agents that are capable of introducing uracil into DNA. In the present study, the participation of UDG in the response to pemetrexed-induced incorporation of uracil into DNA was studied using isogenic human tumor cell lines with or without UDG (UDG(+/+)/UDG(-/-)). UDG(-/-) cells were very sensitive to pemetrexed. Cell killing by pemetrexed was associated with genomic uracil accumulation, stalled DNA replication, and catastrophic DNA strand breaks. By contrast, UDG(+/+) cells were >10 times more resistant to pemetrexed due to the rapid removal of uracil from DNA by UDG and subsequent repair of the resultant AP sites (abasic sites) via the base excision repair (BER). The resistance to pemetrexed in UDG(+/+) cells could be reversed by the addition of methoxyamine (MX), which binds to AP sites and interrupts BER pathway. Furthermore, MX-bound AP sites induced cell death was related to their cytotoxic effect of dual inactivation of UDG and topoisomerase IIα, two genes that are highly expressed in lung cancer cells in comparison with normal cells. Thus, targeting BER-based therapy exhibits more selective cytotoxicity on cancer cells through a synthetic lethal mechanism.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIFemaleGene Knockout TechniquesGlutamatesGuanineHumansHydroxylaminesAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIGlutamatesGuanineHydroxylaminesmethoxyaminePemetrexedUracilUracil-DNA Glycosidase

Identifiers

PMID22237209
PMCPMC3270269
OpenAlexW2036011255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.