Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22236697›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2012

Immune defense mechanisms in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestinal epithelium.

Read Pukkila-Worley, Frederick M Ausubel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Unzipping the defense: a comprehensive review on bZIP transcription factors inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Miquelianin and spiraeoside fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  18. Microbial genomics · 2025
    Article
  19. Frontiers in tuberculosis · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Read Pukkila-WorleyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. rpukkilaworley@partners.org
Frederick M Ausubel

Funding

Technical Mother Machine CoreP01AI083214 · NIAID · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Michael S Gilmore · 2009 to 2026
$39.4M
ROLE OF DIETARY CONSTITUENTS ON GENE EXPRESSION IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMP30DK040561 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHRISTOPHER P DUGGAN · 1994 to 2026
$31.6M
INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND BASIC MICROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMST32AI007061 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Marcia B Goldberg · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
SYSTEMIC AND EPITHELIAL INSECT IMMUNITYP01AI044220 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMAN, JULES A · 1998 to 2008
$10.8M
Identifying novel anti-infectives by high through-put screening in whole animalsR01AI085581 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AUSUBEL, FREDERICK M · 2009 to 2013
$4.7M
A synergy-based therapy against C. difficileR01AI076372 · NIAID · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, KIM · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
Studies of Caenorhabditis elegans innate immunityR01AI064332 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AUSUBEL, FREDERICK M · 2005 to 2009
$2.1M
Innate Immune Recognition of Candida albicans Infection in a C. elegans ModelK08AI081747 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PUKKILA-WORLEY, READ · 2010 to 2014
$684k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI081747NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI044220NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI083214NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064332NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076372NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI085581NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007061NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK040561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal epithelial cells provide an essential line of defense for Caernohabditis elegans against ingested pathogens. Because nematodes consume microorganisms as their food source, there has presumably been selection pressure to evolve and maintain immune defense mechanisms within the intestinal epithelium. Here we review recent advances that further define the immune signaling network within these cells and suggest mechanisms used by the nematode to monitor for infection. In reviewing studies of pathogenesis that use this simple model system, we hope to illustrate some of the basic principles of epithelial immunity that may also be of relevance in higher order hosts.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansEpithelial CellsImmunity, InnateIntestinal Mucosa

Identifiers

PMID22236697
PMCPMC3660727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.