Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22235824›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2012

The hypertension team: the role of the pharmacist, nurse, and teamwork in hypertension therapy.

Barry L Carter, Hayden B Bosworth, Beverly B Green

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Physician-pharmacist co-management and 24-hour blood pressure control.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2013
    Trial
  16. Adherence to blood pressure telemonitoring in a cluster-randomized clinical trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2012
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Barry L CarterDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. barry-carter@uiowa.edu
Hayden B Bosworth
Beverly B Green
Duke University · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

HEALTH PROMOTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001911 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI AU, DAVID H, HARRIS, JEFFREY RANDALL · 2009 to 2013
$14.3M
Systems of Support (SOS) to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-upR01CA121125 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GREEN, BEVERLY BETH · 2007 to 2017
$8.0M
A collaborative model to improve BP control and minimize racial disparities-CCCR01HL091841 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CARTER, BARRY L · 2009 to 2013
$4.7M
University of Iowa Older Adults CERTU18HS016094 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CHRISCHILLES, ELIZABETH A · 2006 to 2010
$4.0M
Long-Term Outcomes and Costs of Web-Based Hypertension Care (e-BPLT)R01HL075263 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI GREEN, BEVERLY BETH · 2004 to 2012
$3.8M
Enhanced Continuity of Pharmacy Care for Cardiovascular or Pulmonary DiseasesR01HL082711 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CARTER, BARRY L · 2007 to 2011
$3.5M
Collaborative Behavioral e-Care to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk (e-Compare)RC1HL100590 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI GREEN, BEVERLY BETH · 2009 to 2010
$989k
NCI NIH HHS R01CA121125NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01 HL082711NHLBI NIH HHS 1RC1HL100590-01NHLBI NIH HHS 2R01HL075263NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL075263NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL082711NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091841PHS HHS 5U18HSO16094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Team-based care is one of the key components of the patient-centered medical home. Studies have consistently demonstrated that teams involving pharmacists or nurses in patient management can significantly improve blood pressure control. These findings have been demonstrated in several meta-analyses and systematic reviews. These reviews have generally found that team-based care can reduce systolic blood pressure by 4-10 mm Hg over usual care. However, these reviews have also concluded that many of the studies had various limitations and that additional research should be conducted. The present state of the art review paper will highlight newer studies, many of which were funded by the National Institutes of Health. Newer strategies involve telephone and/or web-based management which is an evolving area to improve blood pressure control in large populations. Social media and other technology is currently being investigated to assist pharmacists or nurses in communicating with patients to improve hypertension management. Few cost-effectiveness analyses have been performed but generally have found favorable costs for team-based care when considering the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. The authors will suggest additional research that needs to be conducted to help evaluate strategies to best implement team-based care to improve blood pressure management.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementHypertensionPatient-Centered CareBlood Pressure DeterminationBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCost-Benefit AnalysisForecastingHumansModels, OrganizationalNursesNurse's RoleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPractice Patterns, Nurses'

Identifiers

PMID22235824
PMCPMC3257828
OpenAlexW1583436557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.