Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22235818›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2012

Refractory hypertension: definition, prevalence, and patient characteristics.

Maria Czarina Acelajado, Roberto Pisoni, Tanja Dudenbostel, Louis J Dell'Italia, Falynn Cartmill, Bin Zhang, Stacey S Cofield, Suzanne Oparil, David A Calhoun

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. An Update on Refractory Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Refractory hypertension: what do we know so far?Journal of human hypertension · 2021
    Article
  20. β-Arrestin-Biased Agonist Targeting the Brain ATHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2021
    Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Czarina AcelajadoDepartment of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines. czarina.md@gmail.com
Roberto Pisoni
Tanja Dudenbostel
Louis J Dell'Italia
Falynn Cartmill
Bin Zhang
Stacey S Cofield
Suzanne Oparil
David A Calhoun
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USMedical University of South Carolina · USPhilippine General Hospital · PH

Funding

UAB CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE (CCTS) UL1: BPCAUL1RR025777 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2008 to 2011
$22.3M
The Impact on Diabetes on Left Ventricular RemodelingP50HL077100 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DELL'LTALIA, LOUIS · 2005 to 2009
$16.5M
MECHANISMS OF HYPERTENSION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASEST32HL007457 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Martin E Young · 1985 to 2026
$8.6M
The Vascular Chymase-Angiotensin II SystemR01HL079040 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HUSAIN, AHSAN · 2006 to 2014
$3.0M
Etiology of Sleep APnea-Related HyperaldosteronismR01HL075614 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CALHOUN, DAVID A · 2004 to 2011
$2.4M
UAB Biostatistics Pre-doctoral Training ProgramT32HL079888 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ALLISON, DAVID B, CUTTER, GARY R · 2005 to 2014
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS 5UL1 RR025777NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025777NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL077100NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL075614NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL79040NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007457NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL079888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among patients with resistant hypertension (RHTN), there are those whose blood pressure (BP) remains uncontrolled in spite of maximal medical therapy. This retrospective analysis aims to characterize these patients with refractory hypertension. Refractory hypertension was defined as BP that remained uncontrolled after ≥3 visits to a hypertension clinic within a minimum 6-month follow-up period. Of the 304 patients referred for RHTN, 29 (9.5%) remained refractory to treatment. Patients with refractory hypertension and those with controlled RHTN had similar aldosterone levels and plasma renin activity (PRA). Patients with refractory hypertension had higher baseline BP (175±23/97±15 mm Hg vs 158±25/89±15 mm Hg; P=.001/.005) and heart rate, and higher rates of prior stroke and congestive heart failure. During follow-up, the BP of patients with refractory hypertension remained uncontrolled (168.4±14.8/93.8±17.7 mm Hg) in spite of use of an average of 6 antihypertensive medications, while those of patients with controlled RHTN decreased to 129.3±11.2/77.6±10.8 mm Hg. Spironolactone reduced the BP by 12.9±17.8/6.6±13.7 mm Hg in patients with refractory hypertension and by 24.1±16.7/9.2±12.0 mm Hg in patients with controlled RHTN. In patients with RHTN, approximately 10% remain refractory to treatment. Similar aldosterone and PRA levels and a diminished response to spironolactone suggest that aldosterone excess does not explain the treatment failure.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsDrug Resistance, MultipleHypertensionWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceAdultAnthropometryBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationComorbidityDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHeart RateHumansKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID22235818
PMCPMC3400427
OpenAlexW1771940925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.