ArticlePloS one2012
Reproducibility and concordance of differential DNA methylation and gene expression in cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimating and accounting for unobserved covariates in high-dimensional correlated data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022Article
- Histone variants and modifications during abiotic stress response.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- High-Resolution Cartography of the Transcriptome and Methylome Landscapes of Diffuse Gliomas.Cancers · 2021Article
- Identification of Genes Universally Differentially Expressed in Gastric Cancer.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Methylation of theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- DNA methylation, transcriptome and genetic copy number signatures of diffuse cerebral WHO grade II/III gliomas resolve cancer heterogeneity and development.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2019Article
- Article
- Individualized analysis reveals CpG sites with methylation aberrations in almost all lung adenocarcinoma tissues.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
- Coregulation and modulation of NFκB-related genes in celiac disease: uncovered aspects of gut mucosal inflammation.Human molecular genetics · 2014Article
- Prediction of disease-related genes based on weighted tissue-specific networks by using DNA methylation.BMC medical genomics · 2014Article
- [Next-generation sequencing for lung cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2014Review
- MicroRNA and transcription factor mediated regulatory network for ovarian cancer: regulatory network of ovarian cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013Article
- Article
- Cubic regression-based degree of correction predicts the performance of whole bisulfitome amplified DNA methylation analysis.Epigenetics · 2012Article
- Distinct functional patterns of gene promoter hypomethylation and hypermethylation in cancer genomes.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHundreds of genes with differential DNA methylation of promoters have been identified for various cancers. However, the reproducibility of differential DNA methylation discoveries for cancer and the relationship between DNA methylation and aberrant gene expression have not been systematically analysed. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsUsing array data for seven types of cancers, we first evaluated the effects of experimental batches on differential DNA methylation detection. Second, we compared the directions of DNA methylation changes detected from different datasets for the same cancer. Third, we evaluated the concordance between methylation and gene expression changes. Finally, we compared DNA methylation changes in different cancers. For a given cancer, the directions of methylation and expression changes detected from different datasets, excluding potential batch effects, were highly consistent. In different cancers, DNA hypermethylation was highly inversely correlated with the down-regulation of gene expression, whereas hypomethylation was only weakly correlated with the up-regulation of genes. Finally, we found that genes commonly hypomethylated in different cancers primarily performed functions associated with chronic inflammation, such as 'keratinization', 'chemotaxis' and 'immune response'.
conclusionsBatch effects could greatly affect the discovery of DNA methylation biomarkers. For a particular cancer, both differential DNA methylation and gene expression can be reproducibly detected from different studies with no batch effects. While DNA hypermethylation is significantly linked to gene down-regulation, hypomethylation is only weakly correlated with gene up-regulation and is likely to be linked to chronic inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.