ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2011
Tissue engineering of the penis.
Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conventional Penile Reconstruction Versus Penile Allotransplantation: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Living with someone else's penis: The lived experiences of two South African penile allograft recipients: A descriptive phenomenological study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Towards clinical application of tissue engineering for erectile penile regeneration.Nature reviews. Urology · 2019Review
- A Review of Current and Emerging Therapeutic Options for Erectile Dysfunction.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Application of stem cells in tissue engineering for defense medicine.Military Medical Research · 2018Review
- Construction of engineered corpus cavernosum with primary mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Innovative trends and perspectives for erectile dysfunction treatment: A systematic review.Arab journal of urology · 2016Review
- New advances in erectile technology.Therapeutic advances in urology · 2014Review
- Proceedings of the Annual Symposium & Plenary Session on Regenerative Medicine (PASRM).Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine · 2013Article
- Acellular human glans extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue engineering: in vitro cell support and biocompatibility.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital disorders, cancer, trauma, or other conditions of the genitourinary tract can lead to significant organ damage or loss of function, necessitating eventual reconstruction or replacement of the damaged structures. However, current reconstructive techniques are limited by issues of tissue availability and compatibility. Physicians and scientists have begun to explore tissue engineering and regenerative medicine strategies for repair and reconstruction of the genitourinary tract. Tissue engineering allows the development of biological substitutes which could potentially restore normal function. Tissue engineering efforts designed to treat or replace most organs are currently being undertaken. Most of these efforts have occurred within the past decade. However, before these engineering techniques can be applied to humans, further studies are needed to ensure the safety and efficacy of these new materials. Recent progress suggests that engineered urologic tissues and cell therapy may soon have clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.