Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22235160›Full record

ArticleHawaii medical journal2011

An assessment of the Pacific Regional Cancer Coalition: outcomes and implications of a regional coalition internal and external assessment.

Angela U Sy, Karen A Heckert, Lee Buenconsejo-Lum, Johnny Hedson, Suresh Tamang, Neal Palafox

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hawaii medical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sustainability in a state comprehensive cancer control coalition: lessons learned.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2014
    Article
  5. Shining light on cancer in the Pacific.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela U SyOffice of Public Health Studies, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 1960 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA. sya@hawaii.edu
Karen A Heckert
Lee Buenconsejo-Lum
Johnny Hedson
Suresh Tamang
Neal Palafox
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

Research ProjectU54CA153499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHEN, MOON SHAO-CHUANG, CHOW, EDWARD A. · 2010 to 2015
$6.7M
Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health USU58DP000976 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI PALAFOX, NEAL A. · 2007 to 2011
$4.2M
USAPIN PACIFIC REGIONAL CENTRAL CANCER REGISTRYU58DP000835 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI BUENCONSEJO-LUM, LEE ELLEN · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5U58DP000976NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP000835NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP000976NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceThe Pacific Regional Cancer Coalition (PRCC) provides regional leadership in the U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) to implement the Regional Comprehensive Control Plan: 2007-2012, and to evaluate its coalition and partnerships. The Pacific Center of Excellence in the Elimination of Disparities (CEED), aims to reduce cancer disparities and conducts evaluation activities relevant to cancer prevention and control in the USAPI. PURPOSE: The PRCC Self (internal) and Partner (external) Assessments were conducted to assess coalition functioning, regional and national partnerships, sustainability, and the role of regionalism for integrating all chronic disease prevention and control in the Pacific.

methodsSelf-administered questionnaires and key informant telephone interviews with PRCC members (N=20), and representatives from regional and national partner organizations were administered (N=26). Validated multi item measures using 5-point scales on coalition and partnership characteristics were used. Chronbach's alphas and averages for the measures were computed.

resultsInternal coalition measures: satisfaction (4.2, SD=0.48) communication (4.0, SD=0.56), respect (4.0, SD=0.60) were rated more highly than external partnership measures: resource sharing (3.5, SD=0.74), regionalism (3.9, SD=0.47), use of findings (3.9, SD=0.50). The PRCC specifically identified its level of "collaboration" with external partners including Pacific CEED. External partners identified its partnership with the PRCC in the "coalition" stage. PRINCIPAL

conclusionsPRCC members and external partners are satisfied with their partnerships. All groups should continue to focus on building collaboration with partners to reflect a truly regional approach to sustain the commitment, the coalitions and the programming to reduce cancer in the USAPI. PRCC and partners should also work together to integrate all chronic disease prevention and control efforts in the Pacific.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHealth Status DisparitiesProgram EvaluationTreatment OutcomeGeographyHumansNeoplasmsPacific IslandsPatient SatisfactionProgram DevelopmentPsychometricsResidence CharacteristicsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22235160
PMCPMC3254227
OpenAlexW1728187449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.