Adding supplemental parenteral nutrition to hypocaloric enteral nutrition: lessons learned from the Casaer Van den Berghe study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Supplemental parenteral nutrition versus usual care in critically ill adults: a pilot randomized controlled study.Critical care (London, England) · 2018
   Trial
2. How we Provide Nutritional Treatment in Hospitalized Patients?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
   Article
3. "New" Indications for Parenteral Nutrition.Hospital pharmacy · 2016
   Article
4. Development and current use of parenteral nutrition in critical care - an opinion paper.Critical care (London, England) · 2014
   Review
5. Gluttony in the intensive care unit: time to push back from the consensus table.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults.2011

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.