SynthesisJAMA2012
Prognostic indices for older adults: a systematic review.
Synthesis in JAMA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 338 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating the Efficacy and Risks of Anticoagulant Treatments in Multimorbid Frail Older Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation. The European Registry of Older Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation (EUROSAF)
Integrated Approach to Patient and Family Engagement for Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adult Within an Accountable Care Organization (ACO)
Who cites it
338 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction models for the complication incidence and survival rate of dental implants-a systematic review and critical appraisal.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for adverse drug reactions and adverse drug events in older adults-a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- The Italian guideline on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for the older persons: a collaborative work of 25 Italian Scientific Societies and the National Institute of Health.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Guideline
- Pooled it
- Characteristics Associated With Functional Changes During Systemic Cancer Treatments: A Systematic Review Focused on Older Adults.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2021Pooled it
- Attitudes Towards Deprescribing Among Older Adults with Limited Life Expectancy and Their Relatives: A Systematic Review.Drugs & aging · 2020Pooled it
- Health care professionals' attitudes towards deprescribing in older patients with limited life expectancy: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Improving palliative and end-of-life care with machine learning and routine data: a rapid review.HRB open research · 2019Pooled it
- Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018Guideline
- Screening mammography use in older women according to health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2018Pooled it
- Comparison of 6 Mortality Risk Scores for Prediction of 1-Year Mortality Risk in Older Adults With Multimorbidity.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Randomized Trial of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Versus Capecitabine in Older Women With Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Update of the CALGB 49907 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Lipid-lowering therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults aged 75 years and older: a narrative review.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Genetic Syndromes Including Intellectual Disability and Different Cancer Types.Molecular syndromology · 2026Review
- Translating Mortality Hazard Ratios into Remaining-Lifespan Measures in Older Adults Using Japanese Complete Life Tables: A Deterministic Reference-Table Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ethics of artificial intelligence prognostication in palliative care: perspectives from a national survey of palliative care physicians.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2026Article
- Mortality risk estimation for autistic older adults: comparing novel machine-learning derived weights versus standard weights for the Charlson Comorbidity Index.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
278 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextTo better target services to those who may benefit, many guidelines recommend incorporating life expectancy into clinical decisions.
objectiveTo assess the quality and limitations of prognostic indices for mortality in older adults through systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from their inception through November 2011. STUDY SELECTION: We included indices if they were validated and predicted absolute risk of mortality in patients whose average age was 60 years or older. We excluded indices that estimated intensive care unit, disease-specific, or in-hospital mortality. DATA EXTRACTION: For each prognostic index, we extracted data on clinical setting, potential for bias, generalizability, and accuracy.
resultsWe reviewed 21,593 titles to identify 16 indices that predict risk of mortality from 6 months to 5 years for older adults in a variety of clinical settings: the community (6 indices), nursing home (2 indices), and hospital (8 indices). At least 1 measure of transportability (the index is accurate in more than 1 population) was tested for all but 3 indices. By our measures, no study was free from potential bias. Although 13 indices had C statistics of 0.70 or greater, none of the indices had C statistics of 0.90 or greater. Only 2 indices were independently validated by investigators who were not involved in the index's development.
conclusionWe identified several indices for predicting overall mortality in different patient groups; future studies need to independently test their accuracy in heterogeneous populations and their ability to improve clinical outcomes before their widespread use can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.