ArticleInternational ophthalmology2011
The role of serology in active ocular toxoplasmosis.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corticosteroids as adjuvant therapy for ocular toxoplasmosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Corticosteroids as adjuvant therapy for ocular toxoplasmosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Primary ocular toxoplasmosis secondary to venison consumption.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2023Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Findings in Ocular Toxoplasmosis with Multiple Recurrences.International medical case reports journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Ocular toxoplasmosis: a review of the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.International ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Seronegative ocular toxoplasma panuveitis in an immunocompetent patient.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2020Article
- Coinfections and differential diagnosis in immunocompetent patients with uveitis of infectious origin.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Clinical and Biological Correlations in Toxoplasma gondii Infection in HIV Immune Suppressed Persons.Iranian journal of public health · 2015Article
- A 26-year-old man with a blind spot in his left eye.Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our purpose was to examine toxoplasmic serology in relation to episodes of suspected acute toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis and evaluate its use in the appraisal of patients. The mean values of enzymatic immunoassay (EIA) titers for toxoplasmic antibodies were retrospectively compared in patients with active and inactive toxoplasmosis and in a third group of uveitis cases not caused by toxoplasmosis. The proportion of cases under and above a predefined serology value above cut-off was compared in all groups. Between 1995 and 2010, 97 out of 1,276 new uveitis cases seen at the Centre for Ophthalmic Specialized Care (COS), Lausanne, Switzerland were diagnosed as toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis, of which 51 had documented serology available. The mean EIA values for immunoglobulin (Ig) G were 147.75 ± 259.4 IU/ml for patients with active disease, 18.93 ± 23.09 (p < 0.05) for patients with inactive toxoplasmosis and 18.35 ± 20.82 for controls (p < 0.017). The proportion of cases under the designated limit value were 2/51 (4%) in the active retinitinochoroiditis group, 14/27 (52%) (p < 0.05) in the control group, and 7/7 (100%) in the inactive toxoplasmic group (p < 0.001). Three out of 51 cases showed high IgM values in addition to IgG elevation and were primary infections. Toxoplasmosis serology, contrary to popular belief, is useful to confirm active toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis; it is easy to perform, cheap and supports clinical diagnosis in up to 96% of cases, not only by showing positivity but by also showing a significant elevation of titers. In atypical cases serology is not only useful but essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.