Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22234529›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2012

Evaluation of the commercial rapid trehalose test (GLABRATA RTT) for the point of isolation identification of Candida glabrata isolates in primary cultures.

Mark Fraser, Andrew M Borman, Elizabeth M Johnson

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The involvement of theVirulence · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark FraserUK National Mycology Reference Laboratory, Health Protection Agency South West, Myrtle Road, Kingsdown, Bristol, UK. mark.fraser@UHBristol.nhs.uk
Andrew M Borman
Elizabeth M Johnson
Public Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidaemias account for 10-20% of nosocomial bloodstream infections depending on the study. Whilst Candida albicans remains the most frequently isolated species, Candida glabrata may be responsible for as many as 10-25% of all candidaemias. Moreover, C. glabrata is generally less susceptible to the azole antifungals than the majority of other pathogenic yeast species. Thus, a rapid test for the specific identification of isolates of C. glabrata would be useful for patient management if it could be performed at point of isolation, on primary cultures grown on standard mycological media directly from patient specimens. Under certain conditions, C. glabrata rapidly hydrolyses trehalose into glucose. The GLABRATA RTT kit allows detection of the preformed enzyme responsible for this action. This study has assessed GLABRATA RTT as an identification tool specifically at point of isolation. Sixty test isolates were evaluated: 39 clinical isolates of C. glabrata identified at the UK Mycology Reference Laboratory, examples of the recently described genetic relatives of C. glabrata, Candida nivariensis (n = 6) and Candida bracarensis (n = 1), and a selection of other common pathogenic yeast species (n = 14). The test provided results within 30 min. Although 77% (30/39) of confirmed C. glabrata isolates were correctly identified by GLABRATA RTT (positive trehalase test), 23% (9/39) of isolates gave negative or equivocal results. All other yeast species gave negative results. The performance of GLABRATA RTT in this study is compared to previous evaluations of the test which employed isolates pre-cultured on specialised media and to other existing conventional identification methodologies.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresCandida glabrataCandidiasisHumansMycologyReagent Kits, DiagnosticTrehaloseReagent Kits, DiagnosticTrehalose

Identifiers

PMID22234529
OpenAlexW2049748514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.