Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22234387›Full record

ArticlePrimary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group2012

Accuracy of asthma and COPD diagnosis in Australian general practice: a mixed methods study.

Michael J Abramson, Rosa L Schattner, Nabil D Sulaiman, Eleonora A Del Colle, Rosalie Aroni, Francis Thien

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03137303 (Reducing Diagnostic Error to Improve Patient Safety in COPD and Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03137303 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Diagnostic Error to Improve Patient Safety in COPD and Asthma (REDEFINE Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2017 to 2019Enrolled402ConditionsCOPD AsthmaArmsSpirometry at initial visit, Albuterol, Spirometry at 12-month follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prediction models for the development of COPD: a systematic review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. The effect of a post-bronchodilator FEVRespiratory research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COPD - do the right thing.BMC family practice · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Is previous respiratory disease a risk factor for lung cancer?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Spirometry: an essential tool for screening, case-finding, and diagnosis of COPD.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael J AbramsonEpidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rosa L Schattner
Nabil D Sulaiman
Eleonora A Del Colle
Rosalie Aroni
Francis Thien
Monash University · AUEastern Health · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpirometry is the 'gold standard' for diagnosing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but is rarely used in general practice.

aimsTo compare doctor diagnoses with patient reports/spirometry and to determine doctors' perceptions of spirometry.

methodsPatients prescribed inhaled medication were recruited from 31 practices. Doctor diagnoses were extracted from practice records. Patients completed a questionnaire and spirometry before and after bronchodilator. In-depth interviews were conducted with a sample of doctors.

resultsDoctor diagnoses were available for 278 patients: asthma 192 (69%), COPD 38 (14%), asthma/COPD 40 (14%), and eight patients (3%) with other conditions. The diagnosis of asthma was correctly reported by 93% of patients, but only by 61% of those with COPD alone. Among those with both diagnoses, 83% reported asthma and 48% reported COPD. Of those with a diagnosis of COPD, 65% had fixed airflow limitation. Conversely, only 14% of those had been diagnosed with COPD alone. There was no significant difference in reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second between diagnoses. While recognising the value of spirometry in differentiating between asthma and COPD, most general practices only used spirometry in diagnostically difficult cases.

conclusionsDoctor-diagnosed asthma is accurately reported by patients. However, COPD remains substantially under-diagnosed. Spirometry needs to be more widely used to improve the accuracy of respiratory diagnoses in general practice.

Indexed as

AsthmaAustraliaBronchodilator AgentsFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSpirometrySurveys and QuestionnairesBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID22234387
PMCPMC6547914
OpenAlexW1982233712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.