ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2011
Arterial erectile dysfunction: reliability of new markers of endothelial dysfunction.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arterial erectile dysfunction is an early sign of vascular damage: the importance for the prevention of cardiovascular health.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Molecular Mechanisms Underpinning Microparticle-Mediated Cellular Injury in Cardiovascular Complications Associated with Diabetes.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019Review
- Sexual dysfunction: a new tool for early identification of penile endothelial dysfunction.Nature reviews. Urology · 2012Article
- Original evaluation of endothelial dysfunction in men with erectile dysfunction and metabolic syndrome.International journal of impotence researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBlood endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and microparticles (EMP) have been proposed as markers of endothelial dysfunction. Aim of this study was to evaluate a new immunophenotype of EPC and EMP in patients with arterial erectile dysfunction (AED) compared to psychogenic erectile dysfunction (PED). MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred patients (63.2±2.6 yr) with AED were enrolled in this study. Their EPC and EMP concentrations were compared to those of 40 patients with PED (64.2±2.7 yr). EPC (CD45(neg)/CD34(pos)/ CD144(pos)) and EMP (CD45(neg)/CD144(pos)/AnnexinV(pos)) blood concentrations were evaluated by flow cytometry.
resultsPatients with AED had significantly higher blood pressure, triglycerides, homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance, and cavernous artery acceleration time and intima-media thickness than PED; whereas international index of erectile function 5 score, HDL-cholesterol, and cavernous artery peak systolic velocity was lower than PED. Both EPC and EMP were significantly higher in patients with AED compared to patients with PED.
conclusionsPatients with AED showed worse metabolic parameters, cavernous artery parameters, and higher EPC and EMP compared to patients with PED. This suggests that AED is an expression of endothelial dysfunction and that EPC and EMP may be considered predictors of endothelial dysfunction in patients with AED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.