Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22233337›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2012

Potential for pet animals to harbour methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus when residing with human MRSA patients.

D O Morris, E Lautenbach, T Zaoutis, K Leckerman, P H Edelstein, S C Rankin

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Living with dogs and cats: Is it a risk factor for community acquired methicillin-resistantRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Epidemiology of Animal-Associated Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Pet animals as reservoirs for spreading methicillin-resistantJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Feline Otitis Externa Caused by Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D O MorrisDepartment of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. domorris@vet.upenn.edu
E Lautenbach
T Zaoutis
K Leckerman
P H Edelstein
S C Rankin
University of Pennsylvania · USPhiladelphia University · US

Funding

Role of Pet Animals as Reservoirs for MRSA in HouseholdsR21AI073328 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MORRIS, DANIEL OREN · 2008 to 2009
$433k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI073328NIAID NIH HHS R21-AI-073328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) may be persistent in people and is horizontally transmissible. The scientific literature suggests that domestic pets may also participate in cross-transmission of MRSA within households. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for MRSA carriage by pets residing in households with an MRSA-infected person. From 66 households in which an MRSA-infected patient resided, we screened 47 dogs and 52 cats using a swab protocol. Isolates from pets and humans were genotyped using two techniques and compared for concordance. Human participants completed a 22-question survey of demographic and epidemiologic data relevant to staphylococcal transmission. Eleven of 99 pets (11.5%) representing 9 (13.6%) of households were MRSA-positive, but in only six of these households were the human and animal-source strains genetically concordant. Human infection by strain USA 100 was significantly associated with pet carriage [OR = 11.4 (95% CI 1.7, 76.9); P = 0.013]. Yet, for each day of delay in sampling the pet after the person's MRSA diagnosis, the odds of isolating any type of MRSA from the pet decreased by 13.9% [(95% CI 2.6, 23.8); P = 0.017)]. It may be concluded that pets can harbour pandemic strains of MRSA while residing in a household with an infected person. However, the source of MRSA to the pet cannot always be attributed to the human patient. Moreover, the rapid attrition of the odds of obtaining a positive culture from pets over time suggests that MRSA carriage may be fleeting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAged, 80 and overAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisAnimalsCarrier StateCat DiseasesCatsChildChild, PreschoolColony Count, MicrobialCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, BacterialDog DiseasesDogsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID22233337
PMCPMC3326176
OpenAlexW1906098012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.