Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22232673›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Divergence of duplicate genes in exon-intron structure.

Guixia Xu, Chunce Guo, Hongyan Shan, Hongzhi Kong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 559 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
559citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

559 citing papers in PubMed, 1,145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the UMAMIT Gene Family inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Distinct evolutionary trajectories of gene duplication modes in 40 diploid cotton genomes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identification of theBiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

499 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guixia XuState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Chunce Guo
Hongyan Shan
Hongzhi Kong
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Botany · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication plays key roles in organismal evolution. Duplicate genes, if they survive, tend to diverge in regulatory and coding regions. Divergences in coding regions, especially those that can change the function of the gene, can be caused by amino acid-altering substitutions and/or alterations in exon-intron structure. Much has been learned about the mode, tempo, and consequences of nucleotide substitutions, yet relatively little is known about structural divergences. In this study, by analyzing 612 pairs of sibling paralogs from seven representative gene families and 300 pairs of one-to-one orthologs from different species, we investigated the occurrence and relative importance of structural divergences during the evolution of duplicate and nonduplicate genes. We found that structural divergences have been very prevalent in duplicate genes and, in many cases, have led to the generation of functionally distinct paralogs. Comparisons of the genomic sequences of these genes further indicated that the differences in exon-intron structure were actually accomplished by three main types of mechanisms (exon/intron gain/loss, exonization/pseudoexonization, and insertion/deletion), each of which contributed differently to structural divergence. Like nucleotide substitutions, insertion/deletion and exonization/pseudoexonization occurred more or less randomly, with the number of observable mutational events per gene pair being largely proportional to evolutionary time. Notably, however, compared with paralogs with similar evolutionary times, orthologs have accumulated significantly fewer structural changes, whereas the amounts of amino acid replacements accumulated did not show clear differences. This finding suggests that structural divergences have played a more important role during the evolution of duplicate than nonduplicate genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAlternative SplicingComputational BiologyExonsFrameshift MutationGenes, DuplicateGenetic StructuresIntronsMultigene Family

Identifiers

PMID22232673
PMCPMC3268293
OpenAlexW2059569140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.