Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22232603›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2012

Differential Modulation of Thresholds for Intracranial Self-Stimulation by mGlu5 Positive and Negative Allosteric Modulators: Implications for Effects on Drug Self-Administration.

Richard M Cleva, Lucas R Watterson, Meagan A Johnson, M Foster Olive

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Use of Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence.Addictive disorders & their treatment · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard M ClevaInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.
Lucas R Watterson
Meagan A Johnson
M Foster Olive
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Control of ethanol intake by mGluR5-PKCepsilon pathwayR01AA013852 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI OLIVE, M. FOSTER · 2003 to 2013
$2.7M
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Signaling and Extinction LearningR01DA024355 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI OLIVE, M. FOSTER · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
mGluR5 antagonists for methamphetamine addictionR01DA025606 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI OLIVE, M. FOSTER · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013852NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024355NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacological manipulation of the type 5 metabotropic glutamate (mGlu5) receptor alters various addiction related behaviors such as drug self-administration and the extinction and reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. However, the effects of pharmacological modulation of mGlu5 receptors on brain reward function have not been widely investigated. We examined the effects of acute administration of positive and negative allosteric modulators (PAMs and NAMs, respectively) on brain reward function by assessing thresholds for intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). In addition, when acute effects were observed, we examined changes in ICSS thresholds following repeated administration. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with bipolar electrodes into the medial forebrain bundle and trained to respond for ICSS, followed by assessment of effects of mGlu5 ligands on ICSS thresholds using a discrete trials current-intensity threshold determination procedure. Acute administration of the selective mGlu5 NAMs MTEP (0, 0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg) and fenobam (0, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg) dose-dependently increased ICSS thresholds (∼70% at the highest dose tested), suggesting a deficit in brain reward function. Acute administration of the mGlu5 PAMs CDPPB (0, 10, 30, and 60 mg/kg) or ADX47273 (0, 10, 30, and 60 mg/kg) was without effect at any dose tested. When administered once daily for five consecutive days, the development of tolerance to the ability of threshold-elevating doses of MTEP and fenobam to increase ICSS thresholds was observed. We conclude that mGlu5 PAMs and NAMs differentially affect brain reward function, and that tolerance to the ability of mGlu5 NAMs to reduce brain reward function develops with repeated administration. These brain reward deficits should be taken into consideration when interpreting acute effects of mGlu5 NAMs on drug self-administration, and repeated administration of these ligands may be an effective method to reduce these deficits.

Indexed as

allosteric modulatorbrain rewardglutamateintracranial self-stimulationmGluR5

Identifiers

PMID22232603
PMCPMC3252814
OpenAlexW2118420181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.