Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22231630›Full record

ReviewCell research2012

Neural crest stem cells: discovery, properties and potential for therapy.

Annita Achilleos, Paul A Trainor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Biological characteristics and translational research of dental stem cells].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annita AchilleosStowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th Street Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Paul A Trainor

Funding

Intrinsic and extrinsic regulation of cranial mesodermR01DE016082 · NIDCR · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI TRAINOR, PAUL · 2004 to 2014
$3.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE016082NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural crest (NC) cells are a migratory cell population synonymous with vertebrate evolution. They generate a wide variety of cell and tissue types during embryonic and adult development including cartilage and bone, connective tissue, pigment and endocrine cells as well as neurons and glia amongst many others. Such incredible lineage potential combined with a limited capacity for self-renewal, which persists even into adult life, demonstrates that NC cells bear the key hallmarks of stem and progenitor cells. In this review, we describe the identification, characterization and isolation of NC stem and progenitor cells from different tissues in both embryo and adult organisms. We discuss their specific properties and their potential application in cell-based tissue and disease-specific repair.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyAnimalsCell LineageCell MovementDental PulpEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeural CrestRegenerative MedicineStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID22231630
PMCPMC3271580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.