Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22231483›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2012

De novo assembly and genotyping of variants using colored de Bruijn graphs.

Zamin Iqbal, Mario Caccamo, Isaac Turner, Paul Flicek, Gil McVean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 320 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
320citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

320 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. bronko: ultrafast, alignment-free detection of viral genome variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. UShER-TB: Scalable, Comprehensive, Accessible Phylogenomic Analysis ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Pseudoassembly of k-mers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

260 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zamin IqbalWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mario Caccamo
Isaac Turner
Paul Flicek
Gil McVean

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085532Wellcome Trust 086084Wellcome Trust 090532Wellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust WT086084/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting genetic variants that are highly divergent from a reference sequence remains a major challenge in genome sequencing. We introduce de novo assembly algorithms using colored de Bruijn graphs for detecting and genotyping simple and complex genetic variants in an individual or population. We provide an efficient software implementation, Cortex, the first de novo assembler capable of assembling multiple eukaryotic genomes simultaneously. Four applications of Cortex are presented. First, we detect and validate both simple and complex structural variations in a high-coverage human genome. Second, we identify more than 3 Mb of sequence absent from the human reference genome, in pooled low-coverage population sequence data from the 1000 Genomes Project. Third, we show how population information from ten chimpanzees enables accurate variant calls without a reference sequence. Last, we estimate classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes at HLA-B, the most variable gene in the human genome.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenotyping TechniquesAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingGenome, HumanHLA-B AntigensHumansPan troglodytesSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareHLA-B Antigens

Identifiers

PMID22231483
PMCPMC3272472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.