Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22231461›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2012

ECIL-3 classical diagnostic procedures for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases in patients with leukaemia.

M C Arendrup, J Bille, E Dannaoui, M Ruhnke, C-P Heussel, C Kibbler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Refractory versus resistant invasive aspergillosis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. [Bone marrow transplantation patients in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Animal Models of Aspergillosis.Comparative medicine · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

M C ArendrupUnit of Mycology and Parasitology, Microbiological Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institut, Orestads Boulevard 5, Copenhagen, Denmark. maca@ssi.dk
J Bille
E Dannaoui
M Ruhnke
C-P Heussel
C Kibbler
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeidelberg University · DEStatens Serum Institut · DKUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) continue to cause considerable morbidity and mortality in patients with haematological malignancy. Diagnosis of IFD is difficult, with the sensitivity of the gold standard tests (culture and histopathology) often reported to be low, which may at least in part be due to sub-optimal sampling or subsequent handling in the routine microbiological laboratory. Therefore, a working group of the European Conference in Infections in Leukaemia was convened in 2009 with the task of reviewing the classical diagnostic procedures and providing recommendations for their optimal use. The recommendations were presented and approved at the ECIL-3 conference in September 2009. Although new serological and molecular tests are examined in separate papers, this review focuses on sample types, microscopy and culture procedures, antifungal susceptibility testing and imaging. The performance and limitations of these procedures are discussed and recommendations are provided on when and how to use them and how to interpret the results.

Indexed as

LeukemiaCongresses as TopicHumansMycosesPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID22231461
OpenAlexW2089799939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.