Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22230833›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of family medicine

Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings.

N Bruce Baskerville, Clare Liddy, William Hogg

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 350 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
350citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05099497 nacompletednot on this map

Big Data and Little Behaviours: Feedback and Quality Improvement Supports to Primary Care to Facilitate COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled600ConditionsCovid19 Vaccination, Vaccine UptakeArmsUsing Practice Facilitators to Support Physicians
NCT05247333 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation, Integration and Sustainability of a Minor Ailment Service in Usual Practice of Community Pharmacy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de GranadaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled20,987ConditionsAcne, Bites, Burns, ColdArmsMinor ailment service
NCT07560839 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Accelerating Maternal and Newborn Survival: The AMANI Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2026 to 2029Enrolled260ConditionsMaternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response (MPDSR) Implementation, Maternal Mortality, Neonatal Mortality, Perinatal MortalityArmsAudit and Feedback, Enhanced Mentorship
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

350 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Intervention to Improve Psychosocial Care for People with Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N Bruce BaskervillePropel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. nbbaskerville@uwaterloo.ca
Clare Liddy
William Hogg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was a systematic review with a quantitative synthesis of the literature examining the overall effect size of practice facilitation and possible moderating factors. The primary outcome was the change in evidence-based practice behavior calculated as a standardized mean difference.

methodsIn this systematic review, we searched 4 electronic databases and the reference lists of published literature reviews to find practice facilitation studies that identified evidence-based guideline implementation within primary care practices as the outcome. We included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published from 1966 to December 2010 in English language only peer-reviewed journals. Reviews of each study were conducted and assessed for quality; data were abstracted, and standardized mean difference estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Publication bias, influence, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were also conducted.

resultsTwenty-three studies contributed to the analysis for a total of 1,398 participating practices: 697 practice facilitation intervention and 701 control group practices. The degree of variability between studies was consistent with what would be expected to occur by chance alone (I2 = 20%). An overall effect size of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.43-0.68) favored practice facilitation (z = 8.76; P <.001), and publication bias was evident. Primary care practices are 2.76 (95% CI, 2.18-3.43) times more likely to adopt evidence-based guidelines through practice facilitation. Meta-regression analysis indicated that tailoring (P = .05), the intensity of the intervention (P = .03), and the number of intervention practices per facilitator (P = .004) modified evidence-based guideline adoption.

conclusionPractice facilitation has a moderately robust effect on evidence-based guideline adoption within primary care. Implementation fidelity factors, such as tailoring, the number of practices per facilitator, and the intensity of the intervention, have important resource implications.

Indexed as

Health Facility AdministratorsQuality ImprovementClinical Trials as TopicEvidence-Based PracticeHumansPrimary Health CareRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID22230833
PMCPMC3262473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.