Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22230817›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2012

Computer simulations: tools for population and evolutionary genetics.

Sean Hoban, Giorgio Bertorelle, Oscar E Gaggiotti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bridging tradition and innovation: a review of computer simulations in plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Evolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fast simulation of identity-by-descent segments.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fast simulation of identity-by-descent segments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bioengineering hybrid artificial life.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean HobanLaboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, UMR CNRS 5553, Université Joseph Fourier, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble, France.
Giorgio Bertorelle
Oscar E Gaggiotti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer simulations are excellent tools for understanding the evolutionary and genetic consequences of complex processes whose interactions cannot be analytically predicted. Simulations have traditionally been used in population genetics by a fairly small community with programming expertise, but the recent availability of dozens of sophisticated, customizable software packages for simulation now makes simulation an accessible option for researchers in many fields. The in silico genetic data produced by simulations, along with greater availability of population-genomics data, are transforming genetic epidemiology, anthropology, evolutionary and population genetics and conservation. In this Review of the state-of-the-art of simulation software, we identify applications of simulations, evaluate simulator capabilities, provide a guide for their use and summarize future directions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEvolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationAnimalsHumansModels, GeneticPlantsResearch DesignSoftware

Identifiers

PMID22230817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.