ArticleProteome science2012
Prediction and characterization of protein-protein interaction networks in swine.
Article in Proteome science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics characterization identifies conserved candidate gene and reveals breed-specific regulatory mechanisms underlying growth-related traits in pigs.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Host-Pathogen Interactome of the Wheat-Common Bunt System: A Step towards Enhanced Resilience in Next Generation Wheat.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- In silico characterization, docking, and simulations to understand host-pathogen interactions in an effort to enhance crop production in date palms.Journal of molecular modeling · 2021Article
- Advances in multimodal data fusion in neuroimaging: Overview, challenges, and novel orientation.An international journal on information fusion · 2020Article
- Extracellular Vesicles Produced by the ProbioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Construction and analysis of an interologous protein-protein interaction network of Camellia sinensis leaf (TeaLIPIN) from RNA-Seq data sets.Plant cell reports · 2019Article
- Computational identification of protein-protein interactions in model plant proteomes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Inferring pathogen-host interactions between Leptospira interrogans and Homo sapiens using network theory.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Analysis of Predicted Host-Parasite Interactomes Reveals Commonalities and Specificities Related to Parasitic Lifestyle and Tissues Tropism.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- Prediction of cassava protein interactome based on interolog method.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Prediction of host - pathogen protein interactions between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Homo sapiens using sequence motifs.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Integrative analysis of differentially expressed microRNAs of pulmonary alveolar macrophages from piglets during H1N1 swine influenza A virus infection.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- in silico identification of protein-protein interactions in Silkworm, Bombyx mori.Bioinformation · 2014Article
- BIPS: BIANA Interolog Prediction Server. A tool for protein-protein interaction inference.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Virtual interactomics of proteins from biochemical standpoint.Molecular biology international · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudying the large-scale protein-protein interaction (PPI) network is important in understanding biological processes. The current research presents the first PPI map of swine, which aims to give new insights into understanding their biological processes.
resultsWe used three methods, Interolog-based prediction of porcine PPI network, domain-motif interactions from structural topology-based prediction of porcine PPI network and motif-motif interactions from structural topology-based prediction of porcine PPI network, to predict porcine protein interactions among 25,767 porcine proteins. We predicted 20,213, 331,484, and 218,705 porcine PPIs respectively, merged the three results into 567,441 PPIs, constructed four PPI networks, and analyzed the topological properties of the porcine PPI networks. Our predictions were validated with Pfam domain annotations and GO annotations. Averages of 70, 10,495, and 863 interactions were related to the Pfam domain-interacting pairs in iPfam database. For comparison, randomized networks were generated, and averages of only 4.24, 66.79, and 44.26 interactions were associated with Pfam domain-interacting pairs in iPfam database. In GO annotations, we found 52.68%, 75.54%, 27.20% of the predicted PPIs sharing GO terms respectively. However, the number of PPI pairs sharing GO terms in the 10,000 randomized networks reached 52.68%, 75.54%, 27.20% is 0. Finally, we determined the accuracy and precision of the methods. The methods yielded accuracies of 0.92, 0.53, and 0.50 at precisions of about 0.93, 0.74, and 0.75, respectively.
conclusionThe results reveal that the predicted PPI networks are considerably reliable. The present research is an important pioneering work on protein function research. The porcine PPI data set, the confidence score of each interaction and a list of related data are available at (http://pppid.biositemap.com/).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.