Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22230663›Full record

ReviewMaturitas2012

Review of hot flash diaries.

Thomas Guttuso, Will J DiGrazio, Sireesha Y Reddy

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maturitas, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05293860 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Connective Tissue Manipulation on Menopausal Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled52ConditionsMenopause SyndromeArmsConnective tissue manipulation, Superficial massage with the head of the therapeutic ultrasound device
NCT07422727 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

COOLVAS: Exploring the Feasibility and Impact of Cooling Mats on Vasomotor Symptoms in Patients Receiving Endocrine Treatment: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSligo General HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsHot Flashes, Sleep, Hormonal, CancerArmsCooling Gel Mats
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of the climacteric syndrome: a narrative review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas GuttusoUniversity at Buffalo, 3435 Main St., Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. tguttuso@buffalo.edu
Will J DiGrazio
Sireesha Y Reddy

Funding

WOMENS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CAREER CENTERK12HD001332 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WOODS, JAMES R · 1999 to 2009
$3.1M
Effects of Amino Acid Therapy on Hot Flashes in Postmenopausal WomenK23AT001709 · NCCIH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI GUTTUSO, THOMAS J · 2003 to 2007
$666k
Gabapentin vs Estrogen for the Treatment of Hot FlushesR03HD042609 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI REDDY, SIREESHA Y · 2003 to 2004
$158k
NCCIH NIH HHS 1K23-AT-1709-01NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT001709NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001332NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD01332NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD042609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is only 1 published hot flash diary. This diary rates hot flash severity according to 4 categories: mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. The descriptions of these 4 severity categories are located on a separate form from the main data form. For each 24-h period, subjects record the number of hot flashes experienced for each of the 4 severity categories either by recollection or from a separate data source on which hot flashes have been tallied. This diary has been validated but does not conform to the FDA and EMEA guidance for industry. After we observed a high percentage of subjects reporting confusion when using this 4-category diary, we constructed and used a hot flash diary containing 3 severity categories that offered real-time recording of hot flashes, contained all severity definitions on the principle data form and also conformed to the FDA and EMEA guidance for industry. We compare these 2 diaries here and provide a sample of the 3-category diary, which has not been formally validated but is considered valid by the FDA and EMEA in support of drug approval. Either diary is acceptable for use in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Self ReportClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHot FlashesHumans

Identifiers

PMID22230663
PMCPMC3275687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.