Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22230648›Full record

Trial reportProgress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry2012

Rivastigmine reduces "Likely to use methamphetamine" in methamphetamine-dependent volunteers.

R De La Garza, T F Newton, C N Haile, J H Yoon, C S Nerumalla, J J Mahoney, A Aziziyeh

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Pharmacotherapy for stimulant-related disorders.Current psychiatry reports · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R De La GarzaBaylor College of Medicine, Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA. rg12@bcm.edu
T F Newton
C N Haile
J H Yoon
C S Nerumalla
J J Mahoney
A Aziziyeh
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

ZOLENDRONIC ACID IN CHILDREN W/ SEVERE OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTAM01RR000188 · NCRR · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DE LA GARZA, RICHARD · 1985 to 2011
$30.6M
Rivastigmine as a Treatment for Methamphetamine DependenceR01DA023964 · NIDA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DE LA GARZA, RICHARD · 2008 to 2010
$1.2M
SIGNALING &METABOLIC ROLES OF GLUCOSE IN SPERMK01RR000188 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TRAVIS, ALEXANDER J · 2000 to 2004
$589k
NCRR NIH HHS K01 RR000188NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000188NCRR NIH HHS RR 00188NIDA NIH HHS DA 023964NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported that treatment with the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine (3mg, PO for 5days) significantly attenuated "Desire for METH". Given that higher dosages of rivastigmine produce greater increases in synaptic ACh, we predicted that 6mg should have more pronounced effects on craving and other subjective measures. In the current study, we sought to characterize the effects of short-term exposure to rivastigmine (0, 3 or 6mg) on the subjective and reinforcing effects produced by administration of methamphetamine (METH) in non-treatment-seeking, METH-dependent volunteers. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Participants received METH on day 1, and were then randomized to placebo or rivastigmine on day 2 in the morning and treatment continued through day 8. METH dosing was repeated on day 6. The data indicate that METH (15 and 30mg), but not saline, increased several positive subjective effects, including "Any Drug Effect", "High", "Stimulated", "Desire METH", and "Likely to Use METH" (all p's<0.0001). In addition, during self-administration sessions, participants were significantly more likely to choose METH over saline (p<0.0001). Evaluating outcomes as peak effects, there was a trend for rivastigmine to reduce "Desire METH" (p=0.27), and rivastigmine significantly attenuated "Likely to Use METH" (p=0.01). These effects were most prominent for rivastigmine 6mg when participants were exposed to the low dose (15mg, IV), but not high dose (30mg, IV), of METH. The self-administration data reveal that rivastigmine did not alter total choices for METH (5mg, IV/choice). Overall, the results indicate some efficacy for rivastigmine in attenuating key subjective effects produced by METH, though additional research using higher doses and longer treatment periods is likely needed. These data extend previous findings and indicate that cholinesterase inhibitors, and other drugs that target acetylcholine systems, warrant continued consideration as treatments for METH dependence.

Indexed as

MethamphetamineAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersBehavior, AddictiveCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePhenylcarbamatesRivastigmineMethamphetaminePhenylcarbamatesRivastigmine

Identifiers

PMID22230648
PMCPMC3877939
OpenAlexW2072267979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.