ArticleBiology direct2012
On the molecular mechanism of GC content variation among eubacterial genomes.
Article in Biology direct, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smaller Genomes and Shorter Prophage Sequences Differentiate Clinical from Environmental Isolates ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the First Draft Genome of the Oribatid Mite, Oppia nitens: A Standardized Model Invertebrate in Soil Ecotoxicology.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A Novel, Broad-Spectrum, Virulent Bacteriophage TargetingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prospective identification of extracellular triacylglycerol hydrolase with conserved amino acids inBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- The GC% landscape of the Nucleocytoviricota.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Metagenomic clustering links specific metabolic functions to globally relevant ecosystems.mSystems · 2024Article
- Genomics-based analysis of four porcine-derived lactic acid bacteria strains and their evaluation as potential probiotics.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2024Article
- Widespread prevalence of a methylation-dependent switch to activate an essential DNA damage response in bacteria.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Lignocellulolytic Potential of Microbial Consortia Isolated from a Local Biogas Plant: The Case of Thermostable Xylanases Secreted by Mesophilic Bacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Comparative genomics of thermosynechococcaceae and thermostichaceae: insights into codon usage bias.Acta biochimica Polonica · 2024Article
- Genomic profiling and characteristics of a C1 degrading heterotrophic fresh-water bacterium Paracoccus sp. strain DMF.Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Potentiality of Actinomycetia Prevalent in Selected Forest Ecosystems in Assam, India to Combat Multi-Drug-Resistant Microbial Pathogens.Metabolites · 2023Article
- SOS-independent bacterial DNA damage responses: diverse mechanisms, unifying function.Current opinion in microbiology · 2023Review
- Plant Tolerance to Drought Stress with Emphasis on Wheat.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Genomic Legacies of Ancient Adaptation Illuminate GC-Content Evolution in Bacteria.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- The Impact of Harsh Stratospheric Conditions on Survival and Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Non-Spore Forming Multidrug Resistant Human Pathogenic Bacteria Causing Hospital-Associated Infections.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Determinants of associations between codon and amino acid usage patterns of microbial communities and the environment inferred based on a cross-biome metagenomic analysis.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2023Article
- Genomic and phenotypic comparison of polyhydroxyalkanoates producing strains of genusComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Comparative genomic analysis reveals differential genomic characteristics and featured genes between rapid- and slow-growingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- The effect of the genomic GC content bias of prokaryotic organisms on the secondary structures of their proteins.PloS one · 2023Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs a key parameter of genome sequence variation, the GC content of bacterial genomes has been investigated for over half a century, and many hypotheses have been put forward to explain this GC content variation and its relationship to other fundamental processes. Previously, we classified eubacteria into dnaE-based groups (the dimeric combination of DNA polymerase III alpha subunits), according to a hypothesis where GC content variation is essentially governed by genome replication and DNA repair mechanisms. Further investigation led to the discovery that two major mutator genes, polC and dnaE2, may be responsible for genomic GC content variation. Consequently, an in-depth analysis was conducted to evaluate various potential intrinsic and extrinsic factors in association with GC content variation among eubacterial genomes.
resultsMutator genes, especially those with dominant effects on the mutation spectra, are biased towards either GC or AT richness, and they alter genomic GC content in the two opposite directions. Increased bacterial genome size (or gene number) appears to rely on increased genomic GC content; however, it is unclear whether the changes are directly related to certain environmental pressures. Certain environmental and bacteriological features are related to GC content variation, but their trends are more obvious when analyzed under the dnaE-based grouping scheme. Most terrestrial, plant-associated, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria are members of the dnaE1|dnaE2 group, whereas most pathogenic or symbiotic bacteria in insects, and those dwelling in aquatic environments, are largely members of the dnaE1|polV group.
conclusionOur studies provide several lines of evidence indicating that DNA polymerase III α subunit and its isoforms participating in either replication (such as polC) or SOS mutagenesis/translesion synthesis (such as dnaE2), play dominant roles in determining GC variability. Other environmental or bacteriological factors, such as genome size, temperature, oxygen requirement, and habitat, either play subsidiary roles or rely indirectly on different mutator genes to fine-tune the GC content. These results provide a comprehensive insight into mechanisms of GC content variation and the robustness of eubacterial genomes in adapting their ever-changing environments over billions of years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.