ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2012
Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological predictive factors for ipsilateral and contralateral events following initial surgery to treat ductal carcinoma in situ.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2016Trial
- A comparison of breast cancer incidence and cancer stages before and after the introduction of the Austrian national breast cancer screening program in the federal state of Salzburg : Real-world data from the Tumor Registry Salzburg.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
- Results of a worldwide survey on the currently used histopathological diagnostic criteria for invasive lobular breast cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022Article
- The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.BMC cancer · 2018Review
- Effectiveness of and overdiagnosis from mammography screening in the Netherlands: population based study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Article
- Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2017Article
- Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in population screening: does it make breast screening worthless?Cancer biology & medicine · 2017Article
- Histopathological characterization of ulcerated breast cancer and comparison to their non-ulcerated counterparts.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Article
- Effect of implementation of the mass breast cancer screening programme in older women in the Netherlands: population based study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Article
- Re-attendance after false-positive screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands.British journal of cancer · 2013Article
- Mammography screening and women with symptomatic breast cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2013Article
- The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.British journal of cancer · 2013Review
- Article
- Breast cancer screening: evidence of benefit depends on the method used.BMC medicine · 2012Article
- Do not jump too quickly to conclusions.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2012Article
- Is the tide turning against breast screening?Breast cancer research : BCR · 2012Article
- Accuracy of clinical examination of breast lumps in detecting malignancy: a retrospective study.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2012Article
- Trends in Breast Cancer Incidence and Stage Distribution Before and During the Introduction of the Mammography Screening Program in Lithuania.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Breast Cancer Screening Program in Lithuania: Interval Cancers and Program Sensitivity After 7 Years of Mammography Screening.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aims of this study were to determine trends in the incidence of advanced breast cancer at screening mammography and the potential of screening to reduce it.
methodsWe included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening mammograms of 85,274 women aged 50-75 years, who underwent biennial screening at a Dutch breast screening region in the period 1997-2008. Two screening radiologists reviewed the screening mammograms of all advanced screen detected and advanced interval cancers and determined whether the advanced cancer (tumor > 20 mm and/or lymph node positive tumor) had been visible at a previous screen. Interval cancers were breast cancers diagnosed in women after a negative screening examination (defined as no recommendation for referral) and before any subsequent screen. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between women with advanced cancer and women with non-advanced cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ.
resultsA total of 1,771 screen detected cancers and 669 interval cancers were diagnosed in 2,440 women. Rates of advanced cancer remained stable over the 12-year period; the incidence of advanced screen-detected cancers fluctuated between 1.5 - 1.9 per 1,000 screened women (mean 1.6 per 1,000) and of advanced interval cancers between 0.8 - 1.6 per 1,000 screened women (mean 1.2 per 1,000). Of the 570 advanced screen-detected cancers, 106 (18.6%) were detected at initial screening; 265 (46.5%) cancers detected at subsequent screening had been radiologically occult at the previous screening mammogram, 88 (15.4%) had shown a minimal sign, and 111 (19.5%) had been missed. Corresponding figures for advanced interval cancers were 50.9% (216/424), 24.3% (103/424) and 25.1% (105/424), respectively. At multivariate analysis, women with a ≥ 30 months interval between the latest two screens had an increased risk of screen-detected advanced breast cancer (OR 1.63, 95%CI: 1.07-2.48) and hormone replacement therapy increased the risk of advanced disease among interval cancers (OR 3.04, 95%CI: 1.22-7.53).
conclusionWe observed no decline in the risk of advanced breast cancer during 12 years of biennial screening mammography. The majority of these cancers could not have been prevented through earlier detection at screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.