Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22229971›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2012

Biology and pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba.

Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui, Naveed Ahmed Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 311 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
311citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

311 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Implication of Horizontal Gene Transfer BetweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. High prevalence ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2026
    Article
  5. Identification of Acantamoeba isolated from water resources located in the northwest of Iran by using the high-resolution melting analysis assay.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Oxidative Stress and Redox Imbalance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

251 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruqaiyyah SiddiquiThe Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Naveed Ahmed Khan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acanthamoeba is a free-living protist pathogen, capable of causing a blinding keratitis and fatal granulomatous encephalitis. The factors that contribute to Acanthamoeba infections include parasite biology, genetic diversity, environmental spread and host susceptibility, and are highlighted together with potential therapeutic and preventative measures. The use of Acanthamoeba in the study of cellular differentiation mechanisms, motility and phagocytosis, bacterial pathogenesis and evolutionary processes makes it an attractive model organism. There is a significant emphasis on Acanthamoeba as a Trojan horse of other microbes including viral, bacterial, protists and yeast pathogens.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAmebiasisEncephalitis

Identifiers

PMID22229971
PMCPMC3284432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.