Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22227985›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2012

Prior vancomycin use is a risk factor for reduced vancomycin susceptibility in methicillin-susceptible but not methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Kara B Mascitti, Paul H Edelstein, Neil O Fishman, Knashawn H Morales, Andrew J Baltus, Ebbing Lautenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of vancomycin versus nafcillin in enhancing killing of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus causing bacteremia by human cathelicidin LL-37.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kara B MascittiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA. mascitk@slhn.org
Paul H Edelstein
Neil O Fishman
Knashawn H Morales
Andrew J Baltus
Ebbing Lautenbach
University of Pennsylvania · USSt. Luke's University Health Network · US

Funding

Mentoring and patient-oriented research in antimicrobial resistanceK24AI080942 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAUTENBACH, EBBING · 2009 to 2013
$853k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI080942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStaphylococcus aureus is a cause of community- and healthcare-acquired infections and is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) among S. aureus have increased, and reduced vancomycin susceptibility (RVS) may be associated with treatment failure. We aimed to identify clinical risk factors for RVS in S. aureus bacteremia.

designCase-control.

settingAcademic tertiary care medical center and affiliated urban community hospital. PATIENTS: Cases were patients with RVS S. aureus isolates (defined as vancomycin E-test MIC >1.0 μg/mL). Controls were patients with non-RVS S. aureus isolates.

resultsOf 392 subjects, 134 (34.2%) had RVS. Fifty-eight of 202 patients (28.7%) with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates had RVS, and 76 of 190 patients (40.0%) with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates had RVS (P = .02). In unadjusted analyses, prior vancomycin use was associated with RVS (odds ratio [OR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-4.32; P = .046). In stratified analyses, there was significant effect modification by methicillin susceptibility on the association between vancomycin use and RVS (P =.04). In multivariable analyses, after hospital of admission and prior levofloxacin use were controlled for, the association between vancomycin use and RVS was significant for patients with MSSA infection (adjusted OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.11-14.50) but not MRSA infection (adjusted OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.36-2.13).

conclusionsA substantial proportion of patients with S. aureus bacteremia had RVS. The association between prior vancomycin use and RVS was significant for patients with MSSA infection but not MRSA infection, suggesting a complex relationship between the clinical and molecular epidemiology of RVS in S. aureus.

Indexed as

Vancomycin ResistanceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID22227985
PMCPMC3983274
OpenAlexW2053793812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.