Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22227755›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2012

Perceptions of the state policy environment and adoption of medications in the treatment of substance use disorders.

Hannah K Knudsen, Amanda J Abraham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Availability of Medications for the Treatment of Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorder in the USA.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Measures for Predictors of Innovation Adoption.Administration and policy in mental health · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Do preferences of drinker-drivers differ?International journal of health economics and management · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah K KnudsenDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, 109 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA. hannah.knudsen@uky.edu
Amanda J Abraham

Funding

CTN Membership and Adoption of Innovative Tx PracticesR01DA014482 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 2001 to 2011
$8.0M
Diffusion, Adoption, and Implementation of Pharmacotherapies in Alcohol TxF32AA016872 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI ABRAHAM, AMANDA J · 2007 to 2009
$144k
NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA016872NIAAA NIH HHS F32AA016872NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014482NIDA NIH HHS R01DA014482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite growing interest in the use of evidence-based treatment practices for treating substance use disorders, adoption of medications by treatment programs remains modest. Drawing on resource dependence and institutional theory, this study examined the relationships between adoption of medications by treatment programs and their perceptions about the state policy environment.

methodsData were collected through mailed surveys and telephone interviews with 250 administrators of publicly funded substance abuse treatment programs in the United States between 2009 and 2010. Multiple imputation and multivariate logistic regression were used to estimate the associations between perceptions of the state policy environment and the odds of adopting at least one medication for the treatment of substance use disorders.

resultsA total of 91 (37%) programs reported having prescribed any medication for treatment of a substance use disorder. Programs were significantly more likely to have adopted at least one medication if they perceived greater support for medications by the Single State Agency. The odds of adoption were significantly greater if the program was aware that at least one medication was included on their state's Medicaid formulary and that state-contract funding permitted the purchase of medications.

conclusionsStates may play significant roles in promoting the adoption of medications, but adequate dissemination of information about state policies and priorities may be vital to further adoption. Future research should continue to study the relationships between the adoption of medications for treating substance use disorders and the evolving policy environment.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationHealth PolicyAdultAlcohol DeterrentsData CollectionDrug UtilizationEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleFinancing, GovernmentFormularies as TopicHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInformation DisseminationLogistic ModelsMaleMedicaidAlcohol DeterrentsNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID22227755
PMCPMC3428708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.